Suppr超能文献

冲突处理过程中控制的动机和认知决定因素。

Motivational and cognitive determinants of control during conflict processing.

作者信息

Soutschek Alexander, Strobach Tilo, Schubert Torsten

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , Munich , Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2014;28(6):1076-89. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.870134. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that both reward anticipation and expected or experienced conflicts activate cognitive control. The present study investigated how these factors interact during conflict processing. In two experiments, participants performed a variant of the Stroop task, receiving performance-dependent monetary rewards in some blocks. In addition, we manipulated the level of conflict-triggered reactive and expectancy-driven proactive control: In Experiment 1, we compared the Stroop effect after previously congruent and incongruent trials to examine the conflict adaptation effect (reactive control). We found that the level of motivation did not interact with conflict adaptation. In Experiment 2, we varied the proportion of congruent and incongruent trials to manipulate conflict expectancy (proactive control). The data suggest the effects of motivation to be less pronounced under conditions of high conflict expectancy. We conclude that the interaction of motivation with cognitive determinants of control depends on whether these activate proactive or reactive control processes.

摘要

先前的研究表明,奖励预期以及预期的或经历的冲突都会激活认知控制。本研究调查了这些因素在冲突处理过程中是如何相互作用的。在两项实验中,参与者执行了一种变体的斯特鲁普任务,在某些组块中会根据表现获得金钱奖励。此外,我们操纵了冲突引发的反应性控制和预期驱动的主动性控制的水平:在实验1中,我们比较了先前一致和不一致试验后的斯特鲁普效应,以检验冲突适应效应(反应性控制)。我们发现动机水平与冲突适应之间没有相互作用。在实验2中,我们改变了一致和不一致试验的比例,以操纵冲突预期(主动性控制)。数据表明,在高冲突预期条件下,动机的影响不太明显。我们得出结论,动机与控制的认知决定因素之间的相互作用取决于这些因素是否激活了主动性或反应性控制过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验