1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Alliance of Baylor College of Medicine and the University of Texas-Houston Medical School , Houston, Texas.
J Neurotrauma. 2014 May 15;31(10):914-25. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2826. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
Although mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is now recognized as a major health issue, there have been relatively few studies of its acute effects. Previous studies of mTBI assessed at 1 week or less post-injury have produced inconsistent results, spanning reports of no ill effects to findings of robust dysfunction. These gross disparities reflect study differences such as the criteria for mTBI diagnosis and selection of comparison groups. In consideration of these issues, this study investigated outcome in the first 96 hours after injury in adolescents and adults ages 12-30 years with mTBI (n=73) compared with orthopedically injured (OI, n=65) and typically developing controls (TDC, n=40). The mTBI group reported significantly greater general psychological distress, post-concussion symptom severity, and post-traumatic stress severity than OI (all p<0.0001) and TDC (all p<0.0001); the OI and TDC groups responded similarly on these variables. There was a significant Group × Age interaction on the Total score (p<0.009), and the Cognitive (p=0.01) and Somatic (p<0.032) subscales of the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire where increasing symptom severity was associated with increasing age in the mTBI group. On neuropsychological assessment, the mTBI group performed significantly more poorly compared with OI for Verbal Selective Reminding Test (delayed recall, p=0.0003) and Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT written p=0.03; oral, p=0.001). The TDC group more robustly outperformed the mTBI group on these measures and also on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (delayed recall, p<0.04), Letter Fluency (p<0.02), and Category Switching (p<0.04). The TDC group outperformed the OI group on SDMT and Letter Fluency. These findings are consistent with previous reports of acute deficits in episodic memory and processing speed acutely after mTBI. Notably, however, these data also demonstrate the challenges of comparison group selection because differences were also found between the TDC and OI groups.
尽管轻度创伤性脑损伤 (mTBI) 现在被认为是一个主要的健康问题,但对其急性影响的研究相对较少。之前对 mTBI 的研究评估了受伤后 1 周或更短的时间,结果不一致,从没有不良影响到发现明显的功能障碍。这些巨大的差异反映了研究差异,例如 mTBI 诊断标准和对照组的选择。考虑到这些问题,本研究调查了 12-30 岁青少年和成年人 mTBI(n=73)与骨科损伤(OI,n=65)和典型发育对照组(TDC,n=40)在受伤后前 96 小时的结果。mTBI 组报告的一般心理困扰、脑震荡后症状严重程度和创伤后应激严重程度明显高于 OI(均 p<0.0001)和 TDC(均 p<0.0001);OI 和 TDC 组在这些变量上的反应相似。总评分(p<0.009)和 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷的认知(p=0.01)和躯体(p<0.032)分量表上存在显著的组×年龄交互作用,其中 mTBI 组的症状严重程度随年龄的增加而增加。在神经心理学评估中,与 OI 相比,mTBI 组在言语选择性回忆测试(延迟回忆,p=0.0003)和符号数字模态测试(书面 SDMT,p=0.03;口头,p=0.001)的表现明显较差。TDC 组在这些测量和简要视觉空间记忆测试(延迟回忆,p<0.04)、字母流畅性(p<0.02)和类别转换(p<0.04)上的表现也明显优于 mTBI 组。TDC 组在 SDMT 和字母流畅性上的表现优于 OI 组。这些发现与之前报告的 mTBI 后急性记忆和处理速度缺陷一致。然而,值得注意的是,这些数据还表明了对照组选择的挑战,因为 TDC 和 OI 组之间也存在差异。