H.W. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, C.B. 3355, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, C.B. 7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Clin Biochem. 2014 Mar;47(4-5):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.11.023. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
Biobanks - collections of human biological specimens stored for future research use - are crucial for biomedical advancement. One of the most common ways that biobanks acquire specimens is to obtain residual or "leftover" samples originally collected for clinical care from hospitals, clinical laboratories and pathology departments. Little is known about the characteristics of biobanks that store specimens from clinical sources, or their policies and practices.
In this paper, we present data from the subset of 261 biobanks in our 2012 national survey that stores specimens from clinical sources, focusing on a number of ethical issues that have been raised in the literature.
Most biobanks are part of larger organizations, mainly academic medical centers, and most report standardized systems for managing acquisition, storage, and release to researchers. Yet, there is considerable diversity in policies and practices regarding informed consent, return of research results, ownership of specimens and technology developed, utilization, and disposition of remaining specimens after researchers have acquired, them. We document tremendous heterogeneity in the composition of these collections, the number and type of specimens stored, and number of requests for specimens per year.
Responding to this variation presents significant challenges for those who manage the collections, demanding careful consideration and planning to maintain high quality practices in acquisition, storage, and release of specimens all the while striving to protect the rights of subjects.
生物库 - 储存用于未来研究用途的人类生物标本的集合 - 对生物医学的进步至关重要。生物库获取标本的最常见方法之一是从医院、临床实验室和病理科获取原本为临床护理而收集的剩余或“剩余”样本。对于存储来自临床来源的标本的生物库的特征,以及它们的政策和实践,人们知之甚少。
在本文中,我们展示了 2012 年全国调查中 261 个生物库中存储来自临床来源标本的子集的数据,重点关注文献中提出的一些伦理问题。
大多数生物库是更大组织的一部分,主要是学术医疗中心,并且大多数报告了用于管理获取、存储和向研究人员释放的标准化系统。然而,关于知情同意、研究结果的回报、标本和开发的技术的所有权、利用以及研究人员获得后剩余标本的处置,政策和实践存在相当大的差异。我们记录了这些收藏的组成、存储的标本数量和类型以及每年对标本的请求数量的巨大差异。
对于管理这些收藏的人来说,应对这种变化带来了重大挑战,需要仔细考虑和规划,以在获取、存储和释放标本的同时努力保护研究对象的权利,保持高质量的实践。