Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Apr;20(4):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.12.560. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
We evaluated the impact of age and remission status on 242 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in our program between 1999 and 2011. Median age of all patients was 48 years (range, 18 to 71). Based on age and remission status, patients were divided into 4 groups: first complete remission (CR1) age <60 years (n = 116), second complete remission (CR2) age <60 years (n = 78), CR1 age ≥60 years (n = 32), and CR2 age ≥60 years (n = 16). Donors were matched related (n = 155, 64%) or matched unrelated (n = 87, 36%). Median follow-up of survivors was 65 months (range, 12 to 145). In a univariate analysis, 3-year overall survival rates of the 4 groups were 57%, 43%, 39%, and 16% (P = .003), respectively. In a multivariable analysis, hazard ratios of nonrelapse mortality and survival were 2.08 (P = .06) and 1.52 (P = .23), respectively, in patients ≥60 years in CR2 compared with ≥ 60 years in CR1. Although a plateau in survival was observed for patients ≥60 years in CR1 similar to those <60 years in CR1 and CR2, no long-term survivors were seen in patients ≥60 years in CR2. Our data suggest disappointing outcomes in AML patients ≥60 years of age transplanted in CR2. Therefore, if a transplant is indicated, early referral is recommended in patients ≥60 years with AML.
我们评估了年龄和缓解状态对 1999 年至 2011 年间在我们方案中接受同种异体造血细胞移植治疗急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的 242 例连续患者的影响。所有患者的中位年龄为 48 岁(范围 18 至 71 岁)。根据年龄和缓解状态,患者分为 4 组:第一次完全缓解(CR1)年龄<60 岁(n=116),第二次完全缓解(CR2)年龄<60 岁(n=78),CR1 年龄≥60 岁(n=32)和 CR2 年龄≥60 岁(n=16)。供者为匹配相关(n=155,64%)或匹配无关(n=87,36%)。幸存者的中位随访时间为 65 个月(范围 12 至 145 个月)。在单因素分析中,4 组的 3 年总生存率分别为 57%、43%、39%和 16%(P=.003)。在多变量分析中,与 CR1 年龄≥60 岁的患者相比,CR2 年龄≥60 岁的患者非复发死亡率和生存的危险比分别为 2.08(P=.06)和 1.52(P=.23)。尽管 CR1 年龄≥60 岁的患者与 CR1 和 CR2 年龄<60 岁的患者相比,生存曲线出现平台期,但 CR2 年龄≥60 岁的患者中没有长期幸存者。我们的数据表明,AML 患者≥60 岁在 CR2 中移植的结果令人失望。因此,如果需要移植,建议≥60 岁的 AML 患者尽早转介。