Suppr超能文献

α-防御素和θ-防御素对耐抗生素金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的杀菌作用。

Microbicidal effects of α- and θ-defensins against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, USC Norris Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Titus Family Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Innate Immun. 2015 Jan;21(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1753425913514784. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

Abstract

Antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens threaten public health. Because many antibiotics target specific bacterial enzymes or reactions, corresponding genes may mutate under selection and lead to antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, antimicrobials that selectively target overall microbial cell integrity may offer alternative approaches to therapeutic design. Naturally occurring mammalian α- and θ-defensins are potent, non-toxic microbicides that may be useful for treating infections by antibiotic-resistant pathogens because certain defensin peptides disrupt bacterial, but not mammalian, cell membranes. To test this concept, clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), including vancomycin heteroresistant strains, and ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Cip(R)-PA) were tested for sensitivity to α-defensins Crp-4, RMAD-4 and HNPs 1-3, and to RTD-1, macaque θ-defensin-1. In vitro, 3 μM Crp-4, RMAD-4 and RTD-1 reduced MRSA cell survival by 99%, regardless of vancomycin susceptibility. For PA clinical isolates that differ in fluoroquinolone resistance and virulence phenotype, peptide efficacy was independent of strain ciprofloxacin resistance, site of isolation or virulence factor expression. Thus, Crp-4, RMAD-4 and RTD-1 are effective in vitro antimicrobials against clinical isolates of MRSA and Cip(R)-PA, perhaps providing templates for development of α- and θ-defensin-based microbicides against antibiotic resistant or virulent infectious agents.

摘要

抗药性细菌病原体威胁着公众健康。由于许多抗生素针对特定的细菌酶或反应,相应的基因可能在选择下发生突变,导致抗生素耐药性。因此,选择性针对微生物整体细胞完整性的抗菌药物可能为治疗设计提供替代方法。天然存在的哺乳动物α-和θ-防御素是有效的、无毒的杀菌剂,可能对抗生素耐药病原体感染有用,因为某些防御素肽会破坏细菌而不是哺乳动物的细胞膜。为了验证这一概念,对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的临床分离株,包括万古霉素异质耐药株和环丙沙星耐药铜绿假单胞菌(Cip(R)-PA),进行了对α-防御素 Crp-4、RMAD-4 和 HNPs 1-3 以及 RTD-1 的敏感性测试,还测试了猕猴θ-防御素-1。在体外,3μM 的 Crp-4、RMAD-4 和 RTD-1 使 MRSA 细胞存活率降低了 99%,而与万古霉素敏感性无关。对于在氟喹诺酮耐药性和毒力表型上存在差异的 PA 临床分离株,肽的疗效与菌株对环丙沙星的耐药性、分离部位或毒力因子表达无关。因此,Crp-4、RMAD-4 和 RTD-1 是体外抗 MRSA 和 Cip(R)-PA 的有效抗菌药物,可能为基于α-和θ-防御素的杀菌剂针对抗生素耐药或毒力病原体的开发提供模板。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Tool for Predicting, Scanning, and Designing Defensins.用于预测、扫描和设计防御素的工具。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 22;12:780610. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.780610. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Multifunctional cationic host defence peptides and their clinical applications.多功能阳离子宿主防御肽及其临床应用。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Jul;68(13):2161-76. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0710-x. Epub 2011 May 15.
5
Paneth cell α-defensins in enteric innate immunity.肠固有免疫中的潘氏细胞α-防御素。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Jul;68(13):2215-29. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0714-6. Epub 2011 May 11.
9
β-Lactam and glycopeptide antibiotics: first and last line of defense?β-内酰胺类和糖肽类抗生素:第一道和最后一道防线?
Trends Biotechnol. 2010 Dec;28(12):596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验