• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究健康信息技术的成本效益:系统评价方案

Investigating the cost-effectiveness of health information technologies: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

eHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 16;3(12):e003737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003737.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003737
PMID:24345899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3884844/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a need to develop new, more cost-effective models of healthcare and in this vein there is a considerable international interest in exploiting the potential offered by major developments in health information technologies (HITs). Very substantial investments are, as a result, now being made globally, but these still probably only represent a fraction of the investments needed if healthcare is to make the transition from the paper to the digital era. Investing greater resources is, however, inherently challenging and unpopular at a time of financial austerity and this is furthermore complicated by the thus far variable evidence of health benefits and demonstrable short-term to medium-term returns associated with investments in HITs.

OBJECTIVES

Building on our related systematic overviews investigating the impact of HITs, we now seek to estimate the cost-effectiveness of HITs and as a secondary aim to identify potentially transferable lessons in relation to how to realise returns on investments in these technologies.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review to identify the empirical evidence base surrounding the return on investments from implementing HITs. Two reviewers will independently search major international databases for published, unpublished and on-going experimental and quasi-experimental studies of interest published during the period 1990-2013. These searches of bibliographic databases will be supplemented by contacting an international panel of experts. There will be no restriction on the language of publication of studies. Studies will be critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Economic Evaluations checklist. In view of the anticipated heterogeneity in intervention investigated, study design and health system contexts, we will undertake a descriptive, narrative and interpretative synthesis of data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required.

RESULTS

These will be presented in one manuscript. The protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42013005294.

摘要

简介

需要开发新的、更具成本效益的医疗保健模式,因此,国际上非常关注利用健康信息技术(HIT)的重大发展带来的潜力。因此,现在全球范围内正在进行大量投资,但如果医疗保健要从纸质时代过渡到数字时代,这些投资可能还只是所需投资的一小部分。然而,在财政紧缩时期,增加资源投入具有内在的挑战性,而且不受欢迎,而且由于迄今为止与 HIT 投资相关的健康效益证据和可证明的短期到中期回报存在差异,情况变得更加复杂。

目的

在我们相关的系统综述调查 HIT 影响的基础上,我们现在旨在估计 HIT 的成本效益,并作为次要目标,确定与如何实现这些技术投资回报相关的潜在可转移经验。

方法

我们将进行系统综述,以确定围绕实施 HIT 投资回报的实证证据基础。两名审查员将独立搜索主要的国际数据库,以寻找 1990 年至 2013 年期间发表的、未发表的和正在进行的有关 HIT 投资回报的实验和准实验研究。对文献数据库的搜索将通过联系国际专家小组进行补充。研究将不受研究发表语言的限制。研究将使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)经济评估检查表进行批判性评估。鉴于预期干预措施、研究设计和卫生系统背景的异质性,我们将对数据进行描述性、叙述性和解释性综合。

伦理与传播

不需要伦理批准。

结果

这些结果将在一篇文章中呈现。该方案在国际前瞻性系统评价注册处(PROSPERO)CRD42013005294 中进行了注册。

相似文献

1
Investigating the cost-effectiveness of health information technologies: a systematic review protocol.研究健康信息技术的成本效益:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 16;3(12):e003737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003737.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对中风护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,支持其在这方面有效性的证据力度如何?
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2008;6(15):583-632. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200806150-00001.
6
Barriers and facilitators to health information exchange in low- and middle-income country settings: a systematic review protocol.低收入和中等收入国家环境下健康信息交流的障碍与促进因素:一项系统评价方案
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Mar 27;22(2):284-92. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.98.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Rapid antigen detection and molecular tests for group A streptococcal infections for acute sore throat: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.用于急性咽痛的 A 组链球菌感染的快速抗原检测和分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(31):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24310.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.基于家庭的、由护士主导的老年人健康促进的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200.
10
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease: a rapid and systematic review.多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀和加兰他敏治疗阿尔茨海默病的临床疗效及成本效益:一项快速系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(1):1-137. doi: 10.3310/hta5010.

引用本文的文献

1
Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review.医疗保健领域的人力资源信息系统:系统证据综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):633-654. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw141.
2
The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years.英格兰国民健康服务健康检查:对前四年的评估
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e008840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008840.
3
Human Resource Information Systems in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review.医疗保健中的人力资源信息系统:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 1;4(4):e135. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4922.
4
Green perspectives for public health: a narrative review on the physiological effects of experiencing outdoor nature.绿色视角下的公共健康:体验户外自然的生理效应的叙事性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 19;11(5):5445-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505445.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview.远程医疗对医疗质量和安全的影响:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071238. eCollection 2013.
2
Computerised decision support systems for healthcare professionals: an interpretative review.面向医疗保健专业人员的计算机化决策支持系统:一项诠释性综述。
Inform Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115-28. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v20i2.32.
3
Health information technology in the era of care delivery reform: to what end?医疗服务改革时代的健康信息技术:目的何在?
JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2593-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.6663.
4
Electronic health record technology.电子健康记录技术。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 6;307(21):2255-6; author reply 2256. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3520.
5
The NHS IT project: more than just a bad dream.英国国家医疗服务体系信息技术项目:不止是一场噩梦。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):29-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60023-3.
6
Wiring the health system--origins and provisions of a new federal program.构建卫生系统——一项新联邦计划的起源与条款
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 15;365(24):2323-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1110507.
7
The rise and fall of England's National Programme for IT.英国国家信息技术计划的兴衰
J R Soc Med. 2011 Nov;104(11):434-5. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.11k039.
8
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals.英格兰二级保健中全国性电子健康记录的实施和采用:“早期采用者”医院前瞻性全国评估的最终定性结果。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 17;343:d6054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6054.
9
The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.电子健康对医疗保健质量和安全的影响:系统综述。
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.
10
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和Meta分析报告的PRISMA声明:解释与详述。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.