Gurusamy Kurinchi Selvan, Allen Victoria B
Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital,, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 17(12):CD005570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005570.pub4.
Incisional hernias are caused by the failure of the wall of the abdomen to close after abdominal surgery, leaving a hole through which the viscera protrude. Incisional hernias are repaired by further surgery. Surgical drains are frequently inserted during hernia repair with the aim of facilitating fluid drainage and preventing complications. Traditional teaching has recommended the use of drains after incisional hernia repair other than for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. More than 50% of open mesh repairs of ventral hernias have drains inserted. However, there is uncertainty as to whether drains are associated with benefits or harm to the patient.
To determine the effects on wound infection and other outcomes, of inserting a wound drain during surgery to repair incisional hernias, and, if possible, to determine the comparative effects of different types of wound drain after incisional hernia repair.
In November 2013, for this fourth update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL.
We considered all randomised trials performed in adult patients who underwent incisional hernia repair and that compared using a drain with no drain. We also considered trials that compared different types of drain.
We extracted data on the characteristics of the trial, methodological quality of the trials, outcomes (e.g. infection and other wound complications) from each trial. For each outcome, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and based on intention-to-treat analysis.
No new trials were identified by the updated searches. Only one trial was eligible for inclusion in the review with a total of 24 patients randomised to an electrified drain (12 patients) compared with a corrugated drain (12 patients). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for wound infection or in the length of stay in hospital.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether wound drains after incisional hernia repair are associated with better or worse outcomes than no drains.
切口疝是腹部手术后腹壁未能闭合所致,会留下一个供内脏突出的洞。切口疝需通过进一步手术修复。疝修补手术时经常插入手术引流管,目的是促进液体引流并预防并发症。传统观点建议,除腹腔镜腹疝修补术外,切口疝修补术后应使用引流管。超过50%的开放性腹疝修补术会插入引流管。然而,引流管对患者究竟有益还是有害尚不确定。
确定切口疝修补手术中插入伤口引流管对伤口感染及其他结局的影响,并在可能的情况下,确定切口疝修补术后不同类型伤口引流管的比较效果。
2013年11月,在本次第四次更新时,我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、《Cochrane图书馆》、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE和EBSCO CINAHL。
我们纳入了所有针对接受切口疝修补术的成年患者开展的随机试验,这些试验比较了使用引流管与不使用引流管的情况。我们还纳入了比较不同类型引流管的试验。
我们从每项试验中提取了试验特征、试验方法学质量、结局(如感染及其他伤口并发症)的数据。对于每个结局,我们基于意向性分析计算了风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
更新检索未发现新的试验。仅有一项试验符合纳入本综述的条件,共有24例患者被随机分组,其中12例使用电动引流管,12例使用波纹引流管。两组在伤口感染或住院时间方面无统计学显著差异。
尚无足够证据确定切口疝修补术后使用伤口引流管与不使用引流管相比,结局是更好还是更差。