Suppr超能文献

腹外疝修补术中使用网片加强物行腹膜前修补术后的肌后、假体周围引流可减少肌后积液,但住院时间和镇痛药使用延长,对临床结果的影响尚不清楚——一项随机对照试验。

Retromuscular, periprosthetic drainage after hernioplasty with sublay mesh reinforcement in ventral hernias results in less retromuscular fluid collections but longer hospital stay and analgetic use with unclear effect on clinical outcome - a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Visceral, General, and Thoracic Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel Campus, Arnold-Hellerstr. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 5;409(1):334. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03522-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether periprosthetic drain insertion for hernioplasty using sublay mesh augmentation influences retromuscular fluid collections (RFC) and the clinical course.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with open repair of midline hernias (M2-4, W1, European Hernia Society classification) were allocated to groups with or without retromuscular drains. Subcutaneous drainages were used in both groups to avoid confounding from surgical site occurrences due to superficial, subcutaneous fluid collections. The participants underwent clinical and ultrasound assessments on postoperative days (POD) 14 and 30 to detect RFC, subcutaneous seromas, and wound complications. The sample size was estimated using the RFC of a test cohort with drainage; the assumed relevant volume (5 ml) was calculated comprising 84% (mean + 1 SD) of these patients.

RESULTS

In the retromuscular drainage group, the RFC median volume was reduced by 75.2% on POD 14, and by POD 30, no RFC were found [0.2 vs. 25.8 (p < 0.001) and 0 vs. 4.0 (p = 0.02) on PODs 14 and 30, respectively]. The number of patients with RFC ≥ 5 mL was also significantly lower in the drainage group [4 vs. 12 (p = 0.02) and 1 vs. 8 (p = 0.02) on PODs 14 and 30, respectively]. No surgical site infections occurred in either group, but retromuscular hematoseroma led to one revision surgery and one needle aspiration in the group without drainage. In the drainage group, a significantly longer hospital stay (6.5 days vs. 4 days; p = 0.01) and longer regular analgetic intake (6 vs. 3 days; p = 0.03) were observed. Multivariable regression revealed that retromuscular drainage usage was the only independent predictor of the RFC volume.

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of retromuscular drains after hernioplasty with sublay hernia repair reduced periprosthetic fluid collections in our population but prolonged hospital stay. Whether the reduction of RFC can prevent SSO or revision surgery cannot be determined from our data, the relevance is therefore not assessable. Hence, further larger studies are required to determine the clinical relevance of drains.

摘要

目的

确定使用补片加强的腹膜外疝修补术时放置腹膜外引流管是否会影响肌后积液(RFC)和临床病程。

方法

42 例接受中线疝(M2-4、W1、欧洲疝学会分类)开放修补术的患者被分为有或无肌后引流组。两组均使用皮下引流管,以避免因浅表、皮下积液导致的手术部位并发症造成的混杂。术后第 14 天和第 30 天对患者进行临床和超声评估,以检测 RFC、皮下血清肿和伤口并发症。使用引流管的测试队列中的 RFC 估计样本量;假设相关体积(5ml)由 84%(平均值+1SD)的这些患者组成。

结果

在肌后引流组,RFC 中位数体积在术后第 14 天减少了 75.2%,术后第 30 天,未发现 RFC [0.2 与 25.8(p<0.001)和 0 与 4.0(p=0.02),分别在第 14 天和第 30 天]。在引流组中,RFC≥5ml 的患者数量也明显较少[4 与 12(p=0.02)和 1 与 8(p=0.02),分别在第 14 天和第 30 天]。两组均未发生手术部位感染,但在无引流组中,肌后血肿导致 1 例翻修手术和 1 例针吸术。在引流组中,住院时间明显延长(6.5 天与 4 天;p=0.01),常规使用镇痛药的时间也延长(6 天与 3 天;p=0.03)。多变量回归显示,肌后引流的使用是 RFC 体积的唯一独立预测因子。

结论

我们发现,在使用补片加强的腹膜外疝修补术后使用肌后引流可减少我们人群中的假体周围积液,但会延长住院时间。从我们的数据中无法确定 RFC 的减少是否可以预防 SSO 或翻修手术,因此无法评估相关性。因此,需要进一步进行更大规模的研究,以确定引流管的临床相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验