Department of Visceral, General, and Thoracic Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel Campus, Arnold-Hellerstr. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 5;409(1):334. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03522-6.
To determine whether periprosthetic drain insertion for hernioplasty using sublay mesh augmentation influences retromuscular fluid collections (RFC) and the clinical course.
Forty-two patients with open repair of midline hernias (M2-4, W1, European Hernia Society classification) were allocated to groups with or without retromuscular drains. Subcutaneous drainages were used in both groups to avoid confounding from surgical site occurrences due to superficial, subcutaneous fluid collections. The participants underwent clinical and ultrasound assessments on postoperative days (POD) 14 and 30 to detect RFC, subcutaneous seromas, and wound complications. The sample size was estimated using the RFC of a test cohort with drainage; the assumed relevant volume (5 ml) was calculated comprising 84% (mean + 1 SD) of these patients.
In the retromuscular drainage group, the RFC median volume was reduced by 75.2% on POD 14, and by POD 30, no RFC were found [0.2 vs. 25.8 (p < 0.001) and 0 vs. 4.0 (p = 0.02) on PODs 14 and 30, respectively]. The number of patients with RFC ≥ 5 mL was also significantly lower in the drainage group [4 vs. 12 (p = 0.02) and 1 vs. 8 (p = 0.02) on PODs 14 and 30, respectively]. No surgical site infections occurred in either group, but retromuscular hematoseroma led to one revision surgery and one needle aspiration in the group without drainage. In the drainage group, a significantly longer hospital stay (6.5 days vs. 4 days; p = 0.01) and longer regular analgetic intake (6 vs. 3 days; p = 0.03) were observed. Multivariable regression revealed that retromuscular drainage usage was the only independent predictor of the RFC volume.
We found that the use of retromuscular drains after hernioplasty with sublay hernia repair reduced periprosthetic fluid collections in our population but prolonged hospital stay. Whether the reduction of RFC can prevent SSO or revision surgery cannot be determined from our data, the relevance is therefore not assessable. Hence, further larger studies are required to determine the clinical relevance of drains.
确定使用补片加强的腹膜外疝修补术时放置腹膜外引流管是否会影响肌后积液(RFC)和临床病程。
42 例接受中线疝(M2-4、W1、欧洲疝学会分类)开放修补术的患者被分为有或无肌后引流组。两组均使用皮下引流管,以避免因浅表、皮下积液导致的手术部位并发症造成的混杂。术后第 14 天和第 30 天对患者进行临床和超声评估,以检测 RFC、皮下血清肿和伤口并发症。使用引流管的测试队列中的 RFC 估计样本量;假设相关体积(5ml)由 84%(平均值+1SD)的这些患者组成。
在肌后引流组,RFC 中位数体积在术后第 14 天减少了 75.2%,术后第 30 天,未发现 RFC [0.2 与 25.8(p<0.001)和 0 与 4.0(p=0.02),分别在第 14 天和第 30 天]。在引流组中,RFC≥5ml 的患者数量也明显较少[4 与 12(p=0.02)和 1 与 8(p=0.02),分别在第 14 天和第 30 天]。两组均未发生手术部位感染,但在无引流组中,肌后血肿导致 1 例翻修手术和 1 例针吸术。在引流组中,住院时间明显延长(6.5 天与 4 天;p=0.01),常规使用镇痛药的时间也延长(6 天与 3 天;p=0.03)。多变量回归显示,肌后引流的使用是 RFC 体积的唯一独立预测因子。
我们发现,在使用补片加强的腹膜外疝修补术后使用肌后引流可减少我们人群中的假体周围积液,但会延长住院时间。从我们的数据中无法确定 RFC 的减少是否可以预防 SSO 或翻修手术,因此无法评估相关性。因此,需要进一步进行更大规模的研究,以确定引流管的临床相关性。