Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4869-4877. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
BACKGROUND: T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs. METHODS: Between June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: LCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.
背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)后 T 管引流已被证明对胆总管结石(CBDS)引起的急性胆管炎患者是安全有效的。LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 相关急性胆管炎的效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 引起的急性胆管炎的疗效和安全性。
方法:回顾性分析 2015 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间我科行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)+LCBDE 的 368 例胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者的临床资料。其中胆总管炎 193 例行 LC+LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术(PC 组),62 例行 LC+LCBDE 加 T 管引流术(T 管组)。排除无胆管炎的 113 例患者。比较并分析两组患者的临床资料。
结果:两组均无死亡病例。两组患者的发病率、胆漏率、残余 CBD 结石、30 天内再入院率差异均无统计学意义。与 T 管组相比,PC 组避免了 T 管相关并发症,手术时间更短(121.12 min 比 143.37 min),术后住院时间更短(6.59 d 比 8.81 d),住院费用也明显降低(4844.47 美元比 5717.22 美元)。中位随访 18 个月期间,无患者发生胆管狭窄。两组患者结石复发率差异无统计学意义。
结论:LCBDE 加一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 引起的胆管炎是安全有效的。对于合适的患者,LCBDE 加一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 相关急性胆管炎并不逊于 T 管引流。
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019-4-1
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024-11-7
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019-7-25