文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

胆总管切开取石并一期缝合术治疗胆总管结石所致急性胆管炎的疗效及安全性。

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4869-4877. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8. Epub 2021 Nov 1.


DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8
PMID:34724579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9160116/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs. METHODS: Between June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: LCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)后 T 管引流已被证明对胆总管结石(CBDS)引起的急性胆管炎患者是安全有效的。LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 相关急性胆管炎的效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 引起的急性胆管炎的疗效和安全性。

方法:回顾性分析 2015 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间我科行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)+LCBDE 的 368 例胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者的临床资料。其中胆总管炎 193 例行 LC+LCBDE 加 CBD 一期缝合术(PC 组),62 例行 LC+LCBDE 加 T 管引流术(T 管组)。排除无胆管炎的 113 例患者。比较并分析两组患者的临床资料。

结果:两组均无死亡病例。两组患者的发病率、胆漏率、残余 CBD 结石、30 天内再入院率差异均无统计学意义。与 T 管组相比,PC 组避免了 T 管相关并发症,手术时间更短(121.12 min 比 143.37 min),术后住院时间更短(6.59 d 比 8.81 d),住院费用也明显降低(4844.47 美元比 5717.22 美元)。中位随访 18 个月期间,无患者发生胆管狭窄。两组患者结石复发率差异无统计学意义。

结论:LCBDE 加一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 引起的胆管炎是安全有效的。对于合适的患者,LCBDE 加一期缝合术治疗 CBDS 相关急性胆管炎并不逊于 T 管引流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29d/9160116/36ef2829023e/464_2021_8838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29d/9160116/36ef2829023e/464_2021_8838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29d/9160116/36ef2829023e/464_2021_8838_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones.

Surg Endosc. 2022-7

[2]
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis.

Updates Surg. 2022-6

[3]
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure and intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis.

Surg Endosc. 2023-3

[4]
Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones.

J Surg Res. 2013-12-10

[5]
Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients with non-severe acute cholangitis.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022-6

[6]
The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.

Updates Surg. 2024-12

[7]
Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution.

Surg Endosc. 2022-7

[8]
Intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage over primary closure of the common bile duct for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis: a cohort study of 211 cases.

Surg Endosc. 2017-8

[9]
[Operative method choice and strategy of laparoscopic surgery therapy for gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones].

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019-4-1

[10]
Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Safety between Overlapping and Nonoverlapping Surgeries in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.

J Invest Surg. 2022-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Clinical safety study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture in elderly patients: a new strategy for the treatment of stones.

BMC Surg. 2025-8-30

[2]
Primary closure with self-disengaging biliary stent following laparoscopic CBD exploration in normal-diameter ducts: a propensity score matching study.

Sci Rep. 2025-6-6

[3]
Laparoscopic primary suture of the common bile duct in patients with common bile duct stones: a comparative analysis of two suturing methods in terms of safety, efficacy, and convenience with 16-month follow-up.

BMC Surg. 2025-4-12

[4]
Can laparoscopic common bile duct exploration be performed without any drainage? A propensity score-matched study.

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024-11-7

[5]
The incidence, technical management and outcomes of impacted stones encountered during 1447 laparoscopic bile duct explorations.

Surg Endosc. 2025-2

[6]
Is an 8 mm cutoff necessary when performing primary common bile duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration?

Pak J Med Sci. 2024-12

[7]
The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with mild-to-moderate calculus-associated acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.

Updates Surg. 2024-12

[8]
Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review.

Cureus. 2024-10-28

[9]
The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.

Clin Case Rep. 2024-9-4

[10]
Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration-- a 5-year retrospective analysis.

BMC Surg. 2024-7-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic intratumoral resection facilitated by coagulation of giant hepatic hemangioma: a matched case-control study and literature review.

Surg Endosc. 2022-7

[2]
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review.

Surg Endosc. 2022-1

[3]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2021-3

[4]
Can T-tube drainage be replaced by primary suture technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020-12

[5]
Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases.

Surg Endosc. 2021-1

[6]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is safe for management of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients.

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019-7-25

[7]
Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is feasible for elderly patients: 5-Year experience at a single institution.

Asian J Surg. 2019-4-29

[8]
Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2018-6-25

[9]
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of 4 Combinations of Laparoscopic and Intraoperative Techniques for Management of Gallstone Disease With Biliary Duct Calculi: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

JAMA Surg. 2018-7-18

[10]
The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Cholecystectomy for the Management of Cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis.

Ann Surg. 2018-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索