Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Center and Cancer Institute, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e82807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082807. eCollection 2013.
Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is widely used in breast cancer patients for its aesthetic effect. Although several studies have casted suspicion upon the oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, the potential impact of different reconstruction methods on patient survival remains unclear.
We identified 35,126 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients who underwent mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction (autologous reconstruction or implant reconstruction) using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
In multivariate analysis unadjusted for family income, patients undergoing immediate postmastectomy reconstruction exhibited improved BCSS [POOLED reconstruction (any types of reconstruction): hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.95, P = 0.001] and OS (pooled reconstruction: HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.75, P<0.001) compared to patients who underwent mastectomy alone. However, after stratifying by family income, patients receiving reconstruction showed limited advantage in BCSS and OS compared with those undergoing mastectomy alone. When comparing between the two reconstruction methods, no significant differences were observed in either BCSS (implant versus autologous reconstruction: HR = 1.11, 95%CI 0.90-1.35, P = 0.330) or OS (implant versus autologous reconstruction: HR = 1.07, 95% 0.90-1.28, P = 0.424).
Compared to mastectomy alone, immediate postmastectomy reconstruction had limited advantage in survival after adjusting for confounding factor of family income. Our findings, if validated in other large databases, may help to illustrate the actual effect of immediate postmastectomy reconstruction on patient survival.
乳腺癌患者术后常采用乳房重建术以改善乳房美观。尽管有多项研究对即刻乳房重建术的肿瘤安全性提出了质疑,但不同重建方法对患者生存的潜在影响尚不清楚。
我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中,筛选出 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2002 年 12 月 31 日期间 35126 名女性乳腺癌患者。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型比较了行乳房切除术加即刻乳房重建(自体重建或植入物重建)与单纯行乳房切除术患者的乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总生存(OS)。
在未调整家庭收入的多变量分析中,即刻乳房重建术后患者的 BCSS[联合重建(任何类型的重建):风险比(HR)=0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.80-0.95,P=0.001]和 OS(联合重建:HR=0.70,95%CI 0.65-0.75,P<0.001)均优于单纯行乳房切除术的患者。然而,按家庭收入分层后,接受重建的患者在 BCSS 和 OS 方面与单纯行乳房切除术的患者相比优势有限。在比较两种重建方法时,BCSS 方面无显著差异(植入物与自体重建:HR=1.11,95%CI 0.90-1.35,P=0.330),OS 方面也无显著差异(植入物与自体重建:HR=1.07,95%CI 0.90-1.28,P=0.424)。
在调整家庭收入混杂因素后,与单纯行乳房切除术相比,即刻乳房重建术对生存的获益有限。如果在其他大型数据库中得到验证,我们的研究结果可能有助于阐明即刻乳房重建术对患者生存的实际影响。