Suppr超能文献

补充药代动力学措施,以进一步明确单剂量和稳态给药期间每日一次口服控释羟吗啡酮的特征。

Complementary pharmacokinetic measures to further define the profile of once-daily OROS hydromorphone ER during single-dose and steady-state dosing.

作者信息

Devarakonda Krishna, Vandenbossche Joris, Richarz Ute

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacokinetics, Mallinckrodt Inc., 325 James McDonnell Blvd 302W-3, Hazelwood, MO 63042 USA.

Clinical Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2013 Nov 21;2:625. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-625. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Conventional measures such as maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) may be insufficient to fully describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of extended-release (ER) formulations. A complementary measure, the half-value duration (HVD), corresponds to the period of time during a dosing cycle that plasma concentration is at or above half the value of the maximal concentration (i.e. ≥50% C max ). The current post-hoc analysis uses data from 2 previously published studies comparing the PK profiles and HVD of OROS hydromorphone ER (16 mg administered once daily) and immediate-release (IR) hydromorphone (4 mg administered every 6 hours), calculating single-dose and steady-state condition values. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the 2 formulations. Mean steady-state once-daily OROS hydromorphone ER concentrations were elevated for most of the 24-hour dosing period and for significantly longer than with the dose-equivalent IR hydromorphone regimen. The duration of time spent ≥50% C max was, on average, 2.7 times longer at steady state for the ER formulation, which also maintained steady-state hydromorphone plasma concentrations, with 65% lower mean degree of fluctuation versus IR hydromorphone. Both formulations appeared to be well tolerated.

摘要

常规指标,如最大血药浓度(Cmax)和血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC),可能不足以全面描述缓释(ER)制剂的药代动力学(PK)特征。一个补充指标,半值持续时间(HVD),是指在给药周期内血浆浓度等于或高于最大浓度值一半(即≥50% Cmax)的时间段。当前的事后分析使用了两项先前发表研究的数据,比较了奥施康定缓释氢吗啡酮(每日一次服用16毫克)和即释(IR)氢吗啡酮(每6小时服用4毫克)的PK特征和HVD,计算了单剂量和稳态条件下的值。证明了两种制剂之间的生物等效性。在24小时给药期的大部分时间里,每日一次服用奥施康定缓释氢吗啡酮的平均稳态浓度升高,且显著长于等效剂量的即释氢吗啡酮给药方案。在稳态时,ER制剂血浆浓度≥50% Cmax的持续时间平均长2.7倍,其还维持了氢吗啡酮的稳态血浆浓度,与即释氢吗啡酮相比,平均波动度低65%。两种制剂似乎耐受性均良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bd/3863398/41dbc2de2146/40064_2013_703_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验