Steil Garry M
Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02215. garry.steil@childrens/harvard.edu.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Nov 1;7(6):1621-31. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700623.
Closed-loop insulin delivery continues to be one of most promising strategies for achieving near-normal control of blood glucose levels in individuals with diabetes. Of the many components that need to work well for the artificial pancreas to be advanced into routine use, the algorithm used to calculate insulin delivery has received a substantial amount of attention. Most of that attention has focused on the relative merits of proportional-integral-derivative versus model-predictive control. A meta-analysis of the clinical data obtained in studies performed to date with these approaches is conducted here, with the objective of determining if there is a trend for one approach to be performing better than the other approach. Challenges associated with implementing each approach are reviewed with the objective of determining how these approaches might be improved. Results of the meta-analysis, which focused predominantly on the breakfast meal response, suggest that to date, the two approaches have performed similarly. However, uncontrolled variables among the various studies, and the possibility that future improvements could still be effected in either approach, limit the validity of this conclusion. It is suggested that a more detailed examination of the challenges associated with implementing each approach be conducted.
闭环胰岛素给药仍然是实现糖尿病患者血糖水平接近正常控制的最有前景的策略之一。在人工胰腺能够推进到常规使用之前,许多组件都需要良好运行,其中用于计算胰岛素给药量的算法受到了大量关注。大部分关注都集中在比例积分微分控制与模型预测控制的相对优点上。本文对迄今为止使用这些方法进行的研究中获得的临床数据进行了荟萃分析,目的是确定是否有一种方法比另一种方法表现更好的趋势。回顾了与实施每种方法相关的挑战,目的是确定如何改进这些方法。荟萃分析的结果主要集中在早餐餐食反应上,表明迄今为止,这两种方法的表现相似。然而,各项研究中存在未控制的变量,以及两种方法未来仍有可能进一步改进,这限制了该结论的有效性。建议对与实施每种方法相关的挑战进行更详细的研究。