1School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; 2Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; and 3Starkey Hearing Research Center, Berkeley, California, USA.
Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):203-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a8eda4.
Evidence for a clinically significant effect of acclimatization to hearing aids is mixed. The aim of this study was to test for auditory acclimatization effects in new unilateral and bilateral adult hearing aid users. Hypotheses were i) there would be improvements in aided speech recognition in new hearing aid users, compared with unaided listening and with a control group of experienced hearing aid users, and ii) improvements would correlate with severity of hearing loss, hearing aid use, and cognitive capacity.
Speech recognition in noise was measured for a 65 and a 75 dB SPL target with the Four Alternative Auditory Feature test. Speech recognition in noise was measured within 1 week of fitting and retested at 12 weeks postfitting in new hearing aid users (16 unilateral and 16 bilateral fit). A control group of experienced hearing aid users (n = 17) was tested over a similar time scale. Cognitive capacity (reaction time and working memory) was measured, and self-reported change in performance was assessed using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Hearing aid use was assessed via data logging at the completion of the study.
Mean improvements in speech recognition of up to 4% were observed across conditions and across groups consistent with a general practice effect. On average there was no evidence of auditory acclimatization in the new hearing aid user groups in terms of improvement in aided listening conditions above that observed in unaided recognition or in the control group. There was no correlation between change in aided speech recognition and severity of hearing loss, hearing aid use, or cognitive capacity. New users reported significant improvement over time in aided performance on a self-report questionnaire compared with the control group.
On average, there was no improvement over time in new users' aided speech recognition relative to unaided recognition or to the control group. This does not support a robust acclimatization effect with nonlinear hearing aids. Test-retest variability may obscure small average acclimatization effects; variability was not accounted for by individual differences in severity of hearing loss, hearing aid use, or cognitive capacity. New users' subjective report of increased benefit over time may be reflective of other aspects of adjustment to hearing aid use not examined in this study.
适应助听器的临床效果证据不一。本研究旨在测试新单侧和双侧成人助听器使用者的听觉适应效果。假设为:i)与未助听和经验丰富的助听器使用者对照组相比,新助听器使用者的助听言语识别能力会有所提高,ii)改善程度与听力损失严重程度、助听器使用和认知能力相关。
使用四择一听觉特征测试,在 65 和 75dB SPL 目标下测量新助听器使用者(16 名单侧和 16 名双侧使用者)佩戴助听器后 1 周和 12 周的噪声环境下的言语识别能力。在相似的时间范围内,对经验丰富的助听器使用者对照组(n=17)进行测试。通过反应时间和工作记忆测试来测量认知能力,并使用言语、空间和听觉质量量表评估自我报告的性能变化。在研究结束时,通过数据记录评估助听器使用情况。
在所有条件和组中,观察到言语识别率平均提高了 4%,这与一般实践效应一致。在新助听器使用者组中,平均没有证据表明在助听条件下有听觉适应,与未助听识别或对照组相比,改善不明显。在助听言语识别能力的变化与听力损失严重程度、助听器使用或认知能力之间没有相关性。新使用者在自我报告问卷中报告,与对照组相比,随着时间的推移,他们在助听性能方面有显著改善。
平均而言,与未助听识别或对照组相比,新使用者的助听言语识别能力并没有随着时间的推移而提高。这并不支持非线性助听器有明显的适应效应。测试-重测变异性可能掩盖了较小的平均适应效应;个体差异的听力损失严重程度、助听器使用或认知能力并不能解释这种变异性。新使用者随时间推移报告的受益增加可能反映了他们在这项研究中未检查的其他方面的助听器使用调整。