• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知听力能力与听力损失:系统评价与定性元综合。

Perceived listening ability and hearing loss: Systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

机构信息

Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC), West Midlands, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 25;17(10):e0276265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276265. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276265
PMID:36282860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9595527/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss (HL) can affect communication in complex ways. Understanding how adults with HL reflect on and conceptualise the way they listen (metacognition) is required if interventions, and the outcome measures used to evaluate them, are to address barriers to functional communication arising from HL.

OBJECTIVES

This study describes how adults with HL experience and report the processes, behaviours, and components of listening, as presented in published studies.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

METHODS

Systematic searches identified English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles reporting the results of qualitative or mixed-methods studies of adults' with HL perceived listening abilities. Medline, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to November 2021. Handsearching reference lists of included studies identified additional studies for inclusion. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative checklist was used to appraise studies' methodological quality. Data from included studies were analysed using thematic meta-synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of QUALitative (CERQual) approach assessed confidence in the review findings. Two reviewers independently completed all screening and quality appraisal. Thematic meta-synthesis and GRADE CERQual assessment was completed by one reviewer and confirmed by a second reviewer. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion.

RESULTS

Data from 46 studies were included in the review. Thematic meta-synthesis identified six descriptive themes: 1) perceived listening ability; 2) external modifiers; 3) psychosocial impacts of hearing loss; 4) communication partner perspectives; 5) self-efficacy for listening; and 6) cognitive load. GRADE CERQual ratings for descriptive themes ranged from low to moderate confidence. Descriptive themes were related by analytic themes of liminality and reciprocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with HL provide in-depth accounts of components and processes of listening, with studies reporting both cognitive and affective experiences consistent with theoretical models of metacognition. The findings will inform content generation for a hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measure of perceived listening ability in everyday communication.

摘要

背景

听力损失(HL)会以复杂的方式影响交流。如果要解决 HL 引起的功能性沟通障碍,就需要了解听力损失成年人如何反思和概念化他们的倾听方式(元认知),并使用干预措施和评估它们的结果测量。

目的

本研究描述了听力损失成年人如何体验和报告听力过程、行为和组成部分,这些内容在已发表的研究中呈现。

设计

对定性研究进行系统回顾和元综合。

方法

系统搜索确定了以英语发表的、同行评议的期刊文章,这些文章报告了成人听力损失感知听力能力的定性或混合方法研究的结果。从开始到 2021 年 11 月,在 Medline、PsychInfo、Web of Science、Embase 和 Google Scholar 上进行了搜索。对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行手工搜索,以确定纳入的其他研究。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)定性清单评估研究的方法质量。使用主题元综合分析纳入研究的数据。使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)从定性评估的证据的信心(CERQual)方法对审查结果的信心进行分级。两名审查员独立完成所有筛选和质量评估。主题元综合和 GRADE CERQual 评估由一名审查员完成,并由第二名审查员确认。通过讨论解决差异。

结果

该综述纳入了 46 项研究的数据。主题元综合确定了六个描述性主题:1)感知听力能力;2)外部修饰符;3)听力损失的心理社会影响;4)沟通伙伴观点;5)听力自我效能;6)认知负荷。描述性主题的 GRADE CERQual 评分从低到中等信心。描述性主题通过分析主题的中间状态和互惠性相关联。

结论

听力损失成年人提供了对听力过程和组成部分的深入描述,研究报告了与元认知理论模型一致的认知和情感体验。研究结果将为听力特异性患者报告的日常沟通中感知听力能力的结果测量提供内容生成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6a/9595527/93fc6c336938/pone.0276265.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6a/9595527/84b2a23c7971/pone.0276265.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6a/9595527/93fc6c336938/pone.0276265.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6a/9595527/84b2a23c7971/pone.0276265.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6a/9595527/93fc6c336938/pone.0276265.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived listening ability and hearing loss: Systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.感知听力能力与听力损失:系统评价与定性元综合。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 25;17(10):e0276265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276265. eCollection 2022.
2
Adults' with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.成人听力损失者在日常交流中感知听力能力:系统评价和定性荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e051183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051183.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review.用于评估听力损失中感知聆听努力程度的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014995.
5
How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.患者和公众如何理解过度检测和过度诊断?一项定性研究主题荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 6;10(7):e037283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037283.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Experiences and perceived health benefits of individuals with a disability participating in sport: A systematic review protocol.残疾人参与体育运动的经验和感知健康益处:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;10(11):e038214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038214.
8
Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.听力损失成人基于听力的沟通能力:现有测量方法的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:786347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786347. eCollection 2022.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
A systematic review of qualitative evidence: Perspectives of fathers whose partner experienced postpartum psychosis.系统评价定性证据:经历产后精神病的伴侣的父亲的观点。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb;80(2):413-429. doi: 10.1111/jan.15832. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.关于听力对生活质量影响的定性系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Unveiling the Impact of Metacognition on Academic Achievement in Physical Education and Activity Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Qualitative Insights.揭示元认知对体育教育和活动环境中学术成就的影响:基于定性见解的全面系统综述与荟萃分析
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 8;17:973-987. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S444631. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.听力损失成人基于听力的沟通能力:现有测量方法的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:786347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786347. eCollection 2022.
2
Adults' with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.成人听力损失者在日常交流中感知听力能力:系统评价和定性荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e051183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051183.
3
What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.
功能性沟通是什么?应用于失语症康复的现实世界沟通的理论框架。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):937-973. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2.
4
Social observation increases the cardiovascular response of hearing-impaired listeners during a speech reception task.社会观察会增加听力障碍者在言语接受任务中的心血管反应。
Hear Res. 2021 Oct;410:108334. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108334. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.人们如何理解过度检测和过度诊断?定性研究的系统评价和元综合。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114255. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Coping with the social challenges and emotional distress associated with hearing loss: a qualitative investigation using Leventhal's self-regulation theory.应对与听力损失相关的社会挑战和情绪困扰:一项运用莱文索尔自我调节理论的定性研究
Int J Audiol. 2022 May;61(5):353-364. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1933620. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
7
Tinnitus and Metacognitive Beliefs-Results of a Cross-Sectional Observational Study.耳鸣与元认知信念——一项横断面观察性研究的结果
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 23;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010003.
8
Understanding Listening-Related Fatigue: Perspectives of Adults with Hearing Loss.理解与听力相关的疲劳:听力损失成年人的观点。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Jun;60(6):458-468. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1834631. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
Experiences of Hearing Loss and Audiological Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Comorbid Psychological Symptoms: A Qualitative Study.老年共病心理症状患者的听力损失体验及听力学康复:一项定性研究。
Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):809-824. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00123. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Association of Hearing Loss With Psychological Distress and Utilization of Mental Health Services Among Adults in the United States.美国成年人听力损失与心理困扰及心理健康服务利用的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010986. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10986.