Connolly Jason D, Vuong Quoc C, Thiele Alexander
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK Current address: Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, Thornaby TS17 6BH, UK Current address: Department of Psychology, Durham University Science Site, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1519-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht344. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
The brain must convert retinal coordinates into those required for directing an effector. One prominent theory holds that, through a combination of visual and motor/proprioceptive information, head-/body-centered representations are computed within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). An alternative theory, supported by recent visual and saccade functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) topographic mapping studies, suggests that PPC neurons provide a retinal/eye-centered coordinate system, in which the coding of a visual stimulus location and/or intended saccade endpoints should remain unaffected by changes in gaze position. To distinguish between a retinal/eye-centered and a head-/body-centered coordinate system, we measured how gaze direction affected the representation of visual space in the parietal cortex using fMRI. Subjects performed memory-guided saccades from a central starting point to locations "around the clock." Starting points varied between left, central, and right gaze relative to the head-/body midline. We found that memory-guided saccadotopic maps throughout the PPC showed spatial reorganization with very subtle changes in starting gaze position, despite constant retinal input and eye movement metrics. Such a systematic shift is inconsistent with models arguing for a retinal/eye-centered coordinate system in the PPC, but it is consistent with head-/body-centered coordinate representations.
大脑必须将视网膜坐标转换为引导效应器所需的坐标。一种主流理论认为,通过视觉信息与运动/本体感觉信息的结合,以头部/身体为中心的表征在后顶叶皮层(PPC)内被计算出来。另一种理论,得到近期视觉和扫视功能磁共振成像(fMRI)地形图研究的支持,表明PPC神经元提供一个以视网膜/眼睛为中心的坐标系,其中视觉刺激位置和/或预期扫视终点的编码应不受注视位置变化的影响。为了区分以视网膜/眼睛为中心的坐标系和以头部/身体为中心的坐标系,我们使用fMRI测量了注视方向如何影响顶叶皮层中视觉空间的表征。受试者从一个中央起始点进行记忆引导的扫视,到达“时钟周围”的位置。相对于头部/身体中线,起始点在左、中、右注视之间变化。我们发现,尽管视网膜输入和眼球运动指标恒定,但整个PPC中记忆引导的扫视地形图显示,随着起始注视位置的非常细微的变化,空间发生了重组。这种系统性的偏移与主张PPC中存在以视网膜/眼睛为中心的坐标系的模型不一致,但与以头部/身体为中心的坐标表征一致。