Suppr超能文献

在小型和大型社区中,能否同样实现对支持性就业的高度保真?

Is high fidelity to supported employment equally attainable in small and large communities?

机构信息

Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Rivermill Commercial Center, Suite B4-1, 85 Mechanic Street, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA,

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jan;50(1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9687-2. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

Abstract

Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based model to help people with serious mental illness achieve employment. This study examined variation in model adherence in small and large communities. We compared program-level ratings on a standardized 25-item IPS fidelity scale (range = 25-125) for 79 sites in eight states categorized by local community size. Programs in large and small communities achieved comparable fidelity scores (mean = 100 and 104, respectively). Fidelity-outcome correlations within the two groups were both of moderate size. As a practical guide, the IPS fidelity scale is suitable for use in both small and large communities.

摘要

个体安置与支持(IPS)是一种循证模式,旨在帮助患有严重精神疾病的人实现就业。本研究考察了在大小不同的社区中该模式的应用差异。我们比较了来自 8 个州的 79 个服务点在标准化的 25 项 IPS 保真度量表(范围为 25-125)上的项目水平评分,这些服务点根据当地社区规模进行了分类。大小社区中的项目都获得了相当的保真度分数(分别为 100 和 104)。这两个组内的保真度-结果相关性都具有中等大小。作为一个实用指南,IPS 保真度量表适用于大小不同的社区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验