• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在支持性就业的个体安置与支持模型中,准确性自我评估是否有作用?

Is There a Role for Fidelity Self-Assessment in the Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment?

机构信息

Dr. Margolies, Dr. Humensky, Dr. Covell, and. Dr. Dixon are with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York. They are also with the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, where all the other authors except Mr. Baker are affiliated. Mr. Baker is a consultant based in Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):975-978. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600264. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201600264
PMID:28412892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581253/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fidelity assessments help ensure that evidence-based practices are implemented properly. Although assessments are typically conducted by independent raters, some programs have implemented self-assessments because of resource constraints. Self-assessments were compared with independent assessments of programs implementing individual placement and support supported employment.

METHODS

Eleven community-based outpatient programs in New York State completed both self- and independent assessments. Intraclass correlation coefficients and paired t tests were used to compare scores from self- and independent assessments.

RESULTS

For both assessment methods, mean scores for all programs were within the range of fair fidelity. Self- and independent assessment total scores were not significantly different; however, significant differences were found on some scale items in this small sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-assessment may be valid for examining a program's overall functioning and useful when resource constraints prevent independent assessment. Independent assessors may be able to identify nuances, particularly on individual assessment items, that can point to areas for program improvement.

摘要

目的

保真度评估有助于确保实施循证实践的正确性。尽管评估通常由独立的评估者进行,但由于资源限制,一些项目已经实施了自我评估。本文比较了实施个体安置和支持性就业的项目的自我评估和独立评估。

方法

纽约州 11 个社区门诊项目同时完成了自我评估和独立评估。使用组内相关系数和配对 t 检验比较了自我评估和独立评估的分数。

结果

对于两种评估方法,所有项目的平均分数都在保真度的合理范围内。自我评估和独立评估的总分没有显著差异;然而,在这个小样本中,在一些量表项目上发现了显著差异。

结论

自我评估可能是评估项目整体功能的有效方法,在资源限制妨碍独立评估时很有用。独立评估者可能能够识别细微差别,特别是在个别评估项目上,这可以指出项目改进的领域。

相似文献

1
Is There a Role for Fidelity Self-Assessment in the Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment?在支持性就业的个体安置与支持模型中,准确性自我评估是否有作用?
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):975-978. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600264. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
Relationship Between Self-Assessed Fidelity and Self-Reported Employment in the Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment.个体安置与支持模型支持性就业中自我评估的忠诚度与自我报告的就业之间的关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):609-612. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700472. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Comparative Analysis of Independent Reviewer-Rated and Self-Rated Fidelity Scores in Individual Placement and Support Programs: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys.个体安置与支持项目中独立评审员评分与自评保真度得分的比较分析:重复横断面调查
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01413-y. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
4
Development and Validation of a Japanese Fidelity Scale for Supported Employment.日本支持性就业保真度量表的开发与验证
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Mar;45(2):318-327. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0825-y.
5
Prevalence and Quality of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Supported Employment in the United States.美国个别安置与支持(IPS)支持性就业的患病率及质量
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 May;44(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0787-5.
6
Expert ratings on the critical ingredients of supported employment for people with severe mental illness.针对重度精神疾病患者支持性就业关键要素的专家评级。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Spring;31(4):318-31. doi: 10.2975/31.4.2008.318.331.
7
A pan-Canadian evaluation of supported employment programs dedicated to people with severe mental disorders.一项针对致力于严重精神障碍患者的支持性就业项目的全加评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Feb;46(1):44-55. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9207-6. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
Validation of the Revised Individual Placement and Support Fidelity Scale (IPS-25).修订后的个体安置和支持保真度量表(IPS-25)的验证。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):758-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100476.
9
A demonstration project involving peers as providers of evidence-based, supported employment services.一项涉及同伴作为提供循证支持性就业服务提供者的示范项目。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Jun;36(2):99-107. doi: 10.1037/h0094987.
10
Creation of a measure to assess knowledge of the individual placement and support model.创建一个评估个体安置和支持模式知识的测量工具。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Winter;33(3):181-9. doi: 10.2975/33.3.2010.181.189.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Independent Reviewer-Rated and Self-Rated Fidelity Scores in Individual Placement and Support Programs: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys.个体安置与支持项目中独立评审员评分与自评保真度得分的比较分析:重复横断面调查
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01413-y. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Normalization of Prevention Principles and Practices to Reduce Substance Use Disorders Through an Integrated Dissemination and Implementation Framework.通过综合传播和实施框架使预防原则和实践正常化,以减少物质使用障碍。
Prev Sci. 2023 Aug;24(6):1078-1090. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01532-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Self- Evaluation Tool to Support Implementation of Treatment for Tobacco Use Disorder in Behavioral Health Programs.支持行为健康计划中烟草使用障碍治疗实施的自我评估工具。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 May;58(4):812-820. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00890-x. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
The Relationship Between Suicidal Behaviors and Zero Suicide Organizational Best Practices in Outpatient Mental Health Clinics.自杀行为与门诊心理健康诊所零自杀组织最佳实践之间的关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Oct 1;72(10):1118-1125. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000525. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Using Instructional Design, Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, to Develop e-Learning Modules to Disseminate Supported Employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment Programs in New York State.运用教学设计、分析、设计、开发、实施和评估,来开发电子学习模块,以传播纽约州社区行为健康治疗项目的支持性就业服务。
Front Public Health. 2018 May 7;6:113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00113. eCollection 2018.
6
Relationship Between Self-Assessed Fidelity and Self-Reported Employment in the Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment.个体安置与支持模型支持性就业中自我评估的忠诚度与自我报告的就业之间的关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):609-612. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700472. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Interagency Collaborative Team Model for Capacity Building to Scale-Up Evidence-Based Practice.扩大循证实践规模的能力建设跨部门协作团队模式。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014 Apr;39:160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.005.
2
Comparison of Assertive Community Treatment Fidelity Assessment Methods: Reliability and Validity.积极社区治疗忠诚度评估方法的比较:可靠性与有效性
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Mar;43(2):157-67. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0641-1.
3
Use of learning collaboratives by the center for practice innovations to bring IPS to scale in New York State.实践创新中心利用学习协作组织在纽约州推广个性化安置与支持(IPS)模式。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):4-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400383. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
4
Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation.协调各系统和组织的领导力,以营造有利于实施循证实践的战略氛围。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:255-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182447.
5
Is high fidelity to supported employment equally attainable in small and large communities?在小型和大型社区中,能否同样实现对支持性就业的高度保真?
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jan;50(1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9687-2. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
6
Self-assessed fidelity: proceed with caution: in reply.
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):394. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.640419.
7
Self-assessed fidelity: proceed with caution.自我评估的保真度:谨慎行事。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):393-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.640418.
8
A comparison of self-reported and phone-administered methods of ACT fidelity assessment: a pilot study in Indiana.自我报告与电话管理 ACT 保真度评估方法的比较:印第安纳州的一项试点研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Mar 1;64(3):272-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.001252012.
9
Making the case for IPS supported employment.论证IPS支持性就业的合理性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jan;41(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0444-6.
10
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.实施研究的结果:概念区别、测量挑战和研究议程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.