Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Jul;29(4):1028-32.
Laparoscopy has gained clinical acceptance in many subspecialties in the last decade. The conventional open surgery for peritonitis carries significant morbidity and mortality. The present study was done to extend and evaluate benefits of minimally invasive surgery in this subset of patients.
This was a prospective study spanning over a period of four years. All those patients diagnosed as having peritonitis on clinical assessment and preoperative investigations and those who were stable enough haemodynamically were included in this study. After initial resuscitation for few hours, they underwent diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy to identify the cause of peritonitis and to confirm the pathology. All cases were done under general anesthesia, using three standard ports at appropriate sites according to pathology. Patients were treated by different procedures either laparoscopically or with laparoscopic assistance after diagnosis. Operative and post operative data was collected and analyzed.
Ninety two cases of peritonitis underwent diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy. Mean age of patient was 46.5 years. 24 patients were diagnosed as perforated duodenal, in 14 (58.3%) patients laparoscopic suture repair was done and in 8 (33.3%) small upper midline incision was given and perforation was repaired. Out of 32 patients having perforated appendix, 25 (78.1%) patients laparoscopic appendectomy was done while in 7 (21.8%) perforation was dealt by laparoscopic assistance. Out of 14 patients of ileal perforation 6 (42.8%) with minimal contamination laparoscopic suture was applied, while in 8 (57.1%), perforated loop was brought out by making small window and perforation was closed. All 22 patients with pelvic sepsis needed only aspiration of pus and peritoneal lavage. Only one patient died post operatively and 2 (2.1%) patients developed fistula. 6 (6.5%) patients developed port site infection.
Laparoscopic management is feasible, safe and effective surgical option for patients with peritonitis due to different abdominal emergencies in properly selected cases with higher diagnostic yield and a faster postoperative recovery.
在过去的十年中,腹腔镜技术在许多医学专科中得到了临床认可。传统的开腹手术治疗腹膜炎会带来显著的发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在将微创手术的益处扩展并应用于这部分患者。
这是一项为期四年的前瞻性研究。所有在临床评估和术前检查中被诊断为腹膜炎的患者,以及那些血流动力学稳定的患者,都被纳入本研究。在最初的几个小时复苏后,他们接受了诊断性和治疗性腹腔镜检查,以确定腹膜炎的原因并确认病理学。所有病例均在全身麻醉下进行,根据病变在适当部位使用三个标准端口。根据诊断结果,通过不同的程序进行腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助治疗。收集并分析手术和术后数据。
92 例腹膜炎患者接受了诊断性和治疗性腹腔镜检查。患者的平均年龄为 46.5 岁。24 例患者被诊断为十二指肠穿孔,其中 14 例(58.3%)患者行腹腔镜缝合修复,8 例(33.3%)患者行小中线切口修复穿孔。32 例阑尾穿孔患者中,25 例(78.1%)患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,7 例(21.8%)患者行腹腔镜辅助治疗穿孔。14 例回肠穿孔患者中,6 例(42.8%)患者穿孔污染较轻,行腹腔镜缝合,8 例(57.1%)患者行小窗引出穿孔并关闭。所有 22 例盆腔脓肿患者仅需抽吸脓液和腹腔灌洗。只有 1 例患者术后死亡,2 例(2.1%)患者发生瘘管。6 例(6.5%)患者发生端口部位感染。
在适当选择的病例中,腹腔镜治疗因不同腹部急症引起的腹膜炎是一种可行、安全和有效的手术选择,具有更高的诊断率和更快的术后恢复。