• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DOI:10.17226/18577
PMID:24354033
Abstract

Gene transfer research is a rapidly advancing field that involves the introduction of a genetic sequence into a human subject for research or diagnostic purposes. Clinical gene transfer trials are subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at the federal level and to oversight by institutional review boards (IRBs) and institutional biosafety committees (IBCs) at the local level before human subjects can be enrolled. In addition, at present all researchers and institutions funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are required by NIH guidelines to submit human gene transfer protocols for advisory review by the NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC). Some protocols are then selected for individual review and public discussion. provides an assessment of the state of existing gene transfer science and the current regulatory and policy context under which research is investigated. This report assesses whether the current oversight of individual gene transfer protocols by the RAC continues to be necessary and offers recommendations concerning the criteria the NIH should employ to determine whether individual protocols should receive public review. The focus of this report is on the standards the RAC and NIH should use in exercising its oversight function. will assist not only the RAC, but also research institutions and the general public with respect to utilizing and improving existing oversight processes.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
The National Institutes of Health Oversight of Human Gene Transfer Research: Enhancing Science and Safety.美国国立卫生研究院对人类基因转移研究的监督:加强科学与安全。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;871:31-47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18618-4_2.
4
NIH oversight of human gene transfer research involving retroviral, lentiviral, and adeno-associated virus vectors and the role of the NIH recombinant DNA advisory committee.美国国立卫生研究院对涉及逆转录病毒、慢病毒和腺相关病毒载体的人类基因转移研究的监督以及国立卫生研究院重组DNA咨询委员会的作用。
Methods Enzymol. 2012;507:313-35. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386509-0.00016-8.
5
Gene therapy oversight: lessons for nanobiotechnology.基因治疗监管:纳米生物技术的教训。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Winter;37(4):659-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00439.x.
6
Gene transfer: regulatory issues and their impact on the clinical investigator and the good manufacturing production facility.基因转移:监管问题及其对临床研究者和药品生产质量管理规范生产设施的影响。
Cytotherapy. 2003;5(3):197-207. doi: 10.1080/14653240310001271.
7
The NIH Office of Biotechnology Activities Site Visit Program: Observations About Institutional Oversight of Recombinant and Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecule Research.美国国立卫生研究院生物技术活动办公室实地考察计划:关于重组和合成核酸分子研究机构监管的观察
Appl Biosaf. 2015;20(2):75-80. doi: 10.1177/153567601502000202.
8
FDA oversight of NSIGHT genomic research: the need for an integrated systems approach to regulation.美国食品药品监督管理局对NSIGHT基因组研究的监管:采用综合系统方法进行监管的必要性。
NPJ Genom Med. 2019 Dec 10;4:32. doi: 10.1038/s41525-019-0105-8. eCollection 2019.
9
Clinical trial design issues raised during recombinant DNA advisory committee review of gene transfer protocols.
Hum Gene Ther. 2006 Apr;17(4):448-54. doi: 10.1089/hum.2006.17.448.
10
The National Institutes of Health system for enhancing the science, safety, and ethics of recombinant DNA research.美国国立卫生研究院加强重组DNA研究的科学性、安全性和伦理道德的体系。
Comp Med. 2003 Apr;53(2):159-64.