Suppr超能文献

Differences in the pattern of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy in two high-volume centres.

作者信息

Svendsen Lars Bo, Jensen Lone Susanne, Holm Jakob, Kofoed Steen Christian, Pilegaard Hans, Preisler Louise, Vinbæk Marianne, Brandt Bodil, Svendsen Morten B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, 2-12-2, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2013 Dec;60(12):A4733.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Complications to oesophageal and junctional cancer surgery are common and have not diminished much during the past ten years. An unusually high occurrence of anastomotic dehiscence occurred in Denmark in 2009 and 2010 as seen in the national database for oesophagus, cardiac and gastric (ECV) cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In accordance with national guidelines, all patients resected for oesophageal and junctional cancer in Denmark from 2003 were prospectively entered into a national database. Data concerning anaesthesia, peri- and post-operative course, complications, re-operations and time spent in intensive care unit were obtained retrospectively from hospital records. An in-depth analysis of data from two high-volume centres performing ECV cancer surgery according to national guidelines was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 881 patients (Centre 1: 438; Centre 2: 443) were resected for oesophageal and junctional cancer. A total of 79 patients with anastomotic insufficiency (AI) were detected (Centre 1: 36; Centre 2: 43). By using a grading system, it was shown that AI was more severe and occurred earlier in one centre than in the other. Possible factors of influence are discussed, including neoadjuvant oncological therapy, use of thoracoscopically performed anastomosis and perioperative inotrophic drugs.

CONCLUSION

Thanks to the establishment of a nationwide database in pursuance of national guidelines, it was possible to detect variations in quality of surgery over time, evaluate serious complications early and undertake an in-depth analysis of possible aetiological factors. Particularly, comparison was facilitated by the use of a standardised grading system for complications.

FUNDING

not relevant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验