Suppr超能文献

多参数心血管磁共振评估心脏移植血管病。

Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

机构信息

North West Heart Centre and Transplant Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Centre for Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Imaging Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

North West Heart Centre and Transplant Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 4;63(8):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.119. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) using contemporary invasive epicardial artery and microvascular assessment techniques as reference standards, and to compare the performance of CMR with that of angiography.

BACKGROUND

CAV continues to limit the long-term survival of heart transplant recipients. Coronary angiography has a Class I recommendation for CAV surveillance and annual or biannual surveillance angiography is performed routinely in most centers.

METHODS

All transplant recipients referred for surveillance angiography at a single UK center over a 2-year period were prospectively screened for study eligibility. Patients prospectively underwent coronary angiography followed by coronary intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance. Within 1 month, patients underwent multiparametric CMR, including assessment of regional and global ventricular function, absolute myocardial blood flow quantification, and myocardial tissue characterization. In addition, 10 healthy volunteers underwent CMR.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were recruited, median 7.1 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 10.3 years) since transplantation. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve was the only independent predictor of both epicardial (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) and microvascular disease (β = -0.60, p < 0.001) on stepwise multivariable regression. The CMR myocardial perfusion reserve significantly outperformed angiography for detecting moderate CAV (area under the curve, 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.00] vs. 0.59 [95% CI: 0.42 to 0.77], p = 0.01) and severe CAV (area under the curve, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98] vs. 0.67 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82], p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CAV, including epicardial and microvascular components, can be detected more accurately using noninvasive CMR-based absolute myocardial blood flow assessment than with invasive coronary angiography, the current clinical surveillance technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估多参数心血管磁共振(CMR)在使用当代经皮冠状动脉和微血管评估技术作为参考标准检测心脏移植物血管病(CAV)方面的诊断性能,并比较 CMR 与血管造影的性能。

背景

CAV 仍然限制了心脏移植受者的长期生存。冠状动脉造影对 CAV 监测有 I 级推荐,大多数中心常规进行年度或半年度监测血管造影。

方法

在英国的一家中心进行监测血管造影的所有移植受者在 2 年期间前瞻性筛选研究入选标准。患者前瞻性接受冠状动脉造影,然后进行冠状动脉血管内超声、血流储备分数和微血管阻力指数检查。在 1 个月内,患者接受多参数 CMR,包括评估局部和整体心室功能、绝对心肌血流定量和心肌组织特征化。此外,10 名健康志愿者接受 CMR。

结果

共招募 48 例患者,中位时间为移植后 7.1 年(四分位距:4.6 至 10.3 年)。CMR 心肌灌注储备是唯一能独立预测冠状动脉(β=-0.57,p<0.001)和微血管疾病(β=-0.60,p<0.001)的多变量逐步回归的预测因子。CMR 心肌灌注储备在检测中度 CAV(曲线下面积 0.89 [95%置信区间:0.79 至 1.00] vs. 0.59 [95%置信区间:0.42 至 0.77],p=0.01)和重度 CAV(曲线下面积 0.88 [95%置信区间:0.78 至 0.98] vs. 0.67 [95%置信区间:0.52 至 0.82],p=0.05)方面明显优于血管造影。

结论

与当前的临床监测技术——经皮冠状动脉血管造影相比,CAV,包括心外膜和微血管成分,可通过非侵入性 CMR 基于绝对心肌血流评估更准确地检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验