Lobo S, Ferro J M, Barinagarrementeria F, Bousser M G, Canhão P, Stam J
Department of Neurosciences (Neurology), Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(1):38-42. doi: 10.1159/000356524. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
The efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid shunting to reduce intracranial hypertension and prevent fatal brain herniation in acute cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is unknown.
From the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT) and a systematic literature review, we retrieved acute CVT patients treated only with shunting (external ventricular drain, ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculojugular shunt). Outcome was classified at 6 months and final follow-up by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
15 patients were collected (9 from the ISCVT and 6 from the review) who were treated with a shunt (external ventricular drain in 6 patients, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in 8 patients or an unspecified type of shunt in another one). Eight patients (53.3%) regained independence (mRS 0-2), while 2 patients (13.3%) were left with a severe handicap (mRS 4-6) and 4 (26.7%) died despite treatment. Five patients with parenchymal lesions were shunted within 48 h from admission deterioration, 4 with an external ventricular drain: 2 (40%) recovered to independence, 2 (40%) had a severe handicap and 1 (20%) died. In contrast, all 3 patients with intracranial hypertension and no parenchymal lesions receiving a ventriculoperitoneal shunt later than 48 h regained independence.
A quarter of acute CVT patients treated with a shunt died, and only half regained independence. With the limitation of the small number of subjects, this review suggests that shunting does not appear to be effective in preventing death from brain herniation in acute CVT. We cannot exclude that shunting may benefit patients with sustained intracranial hypertension and no parenchymal lesions.
脑脊液分流术在减轻急性脑静脉血栓形成(CVT)患者的颅内高压及预防致命性脑疝方面的疗效尚不清楚。
从国际脑静脉和硬脑膜窦血栓形成研究(ISCVT)及系统文献综述中,我们检索了仅接受分流术(脑室外引流、脑室腹腔或脑室颈静脉分流术)治疗的急性CVT患者。结局在6个月时及末次随访时根据改良Rankin量表(mRS)进行分类。
共收集到15例患者(9例来自ISCVT,6例来自综述)接受了分流术(6例患者行脑室外引流,8例患者行脑室腹腔分流术,另1例患者行未明确类型的分流术)。8例患者(53.3%)恢复独立(mRS 0 - 2),2例患者(13.3%)遗留严重残疾(mRS 4 - 6),4例患者(26.7%)尽管接受了治疗仍死亡。5例有脑实质病变的患者在入院病情恶化后48小时内接受了分流术,其中4例采用脑室外引流:2例(40%)恢复独立,2例(40%)有严重残疾,1例(20%)死亡。相比之下,所有3例颅内高压且无脑实质病变的患者在48小时后接受脑室腹腔分流术均恢复独立。
接受分流术治疗的急性CVT患者中有四分之一死亡,仅有一半恢复独立。鉴于研究对象数量有限,本综述提示分流术似乎不能有效预防急性CVT患者因脑疝死亡。我们不能排除分流术可能使持续颅内高压且无脑实质病变的患者获益。