Do Diana V, Gichuhi Stephen, Vedula Satyanarayana S, Hawkins Barbara S
Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 3902 Leavenworth Street, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, 68105.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 19;12(12):CD006366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006366.pub3.
Cataract formation or acceleration can occur after intraocular surgery, especially following vitrectomy, a surgical technique for removing the vitreous which is used in the treatment of disorders that affect the posterior segment of the eye. The underlying problem that led to vitrectomy may limit the benefit from cataract surgery.
The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of surgery for post-vitrectomy cataract with respect to visual acuity, quality of life, and other outcomes.
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE in-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily Update, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to May 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2013, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to May 2013), PubMed (January 1946 to May 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrial.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 22 May 2013.
We planned to include randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing cataract surgery with no surgery in adult patients who developed cataract following vitrectomy.
Two authors screened the search results independently according to the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.
We found no randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing cataract surgery with no cataract surgery for patients who developed cataracts following vitrectomy surgery.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials on which to base clinical recommendations for surgery for post-vitrectomy cataract. There is a clear need for randomized controlled trials to address this evidence gap. Such trials should stratify participants by their age, the retinal disorder leading to vitrectomy, and the status of the underlying disease process in the contralateral eye. Outcomes assessed in such trials may include gain of vision on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, quality of life, and adverse events such as posterior capsular rupture. Both short-term (six-month) and long-term (one-year or two-year) outcomes should be examined.
白内障形成或加速可发生于眼内手术后,尤其是玻璃体切除术后。玻璃体切除术是一种用于治疗影响眼球后段疾病的手术技术,用于切除玻璃体。导致玻璃体切除术的潜在问题可能会限制白内障手术的益处。
本综述的目的是评估玻璃体切除术后白内障手术在视力、生活质量和其他结局方面的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了CENTRAL(其中包含Cochrane眼科和视力组试验注册库)(《Cochrane图书馆》2013年第4期)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid MEDLINE在研及其他未索引引文、Ovid MEDLINE每日更新、Ovid OLDMEDLINE(1946年1月至2013年5月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2013年5月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献数据库(LILACS)(1982年1月至2013年5月)、PubMed(1946年1月至2013年5月)、对照试验元注册库(mRCT)(www.controlled-trials.com)、ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrial.gov)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en)。在电子检索试验时,我们未使用任何日期或语言限制。我们最后一次检索电子数据库是在2013年5月22日。
我们计划纳入比较玻璃体切除术后发生白内障的成年患者白内障手术与非手术治疗的随机和半随机对照试验。
两位作者根据Cochrane协作网预期的标准方法程序独立筛选检索结果。
我们未发现比较玻璃体切除术后发生白内障患者白内障手术与非白内障手术的随机或半随机对照试验。
没有随机或半随机对照试验的证据可作为玻璃体切除术后白内障手术临床推荐的依据。显然需要进行随机对照试验来填补这一证据空白。此类试验应根据参与者的年龄、导致玻璃体切除术的视网膜疾病以及对侧眼潜在疾病进程的状况进行分层。此类试验评估的结局可能包括早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)量表上的视力提高、生活质量以及后囊破裂等不良事件。应检查短期(六个月)和长期(一年或两年)结局。