ACCURACY OF NEW INTRAOCULAR LENS CALCULATION FORMULAE IN EYES UNDERGOING SILICONE OIL REMOVAL/PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY-CATARACT SURGERY.

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of novel intraocular lens calculation formulae (Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical, and Kane) and conventional formulae (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T [SRK/T]) in patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy or silicone oil removal combined with cataract surgery.

METHODS

In total, 301 eyes from 301 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy/silicone oil removal with concomitant cataract surgery were enrolled and divided into the following four groups according to preoperative diagnosis: silicone oil-filled eyes after pars plana vitrectomy, epiretinal membrane, primary retinal detachment, and macular hole.

RESULTS

Barrett Universal II exhibited the smallest mean absolute error (0.65 diopters [D]) and median absolute error (0.39 D) in total. In patients with primary retinal detachment, each formula exhibited the worst refractive outcomes in diverse vitreoretinal pathologies ( P < 0.01), and no difference in accuracy between the seven formulas was observed ( P = 0.075). For long eyes, the second linear (Wang-Koch 2) version of the Wang-Koch adjustment significantly reduced the median absolute error for Holladay 1 and SRK/T ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

In combined surgery, both new and conventional formulas using the second linear version of the Wang-Koch 2 adjustment demonstrated satisfactory performance, with Barrett Universal II exhibiting the best overall performance. However, in patients with primary retinal detachment, all seven formulas showed less favorable performance.