Levine Steven B, Truitt Theodore, Schwartz Michael, Atkins James
Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
St Cloud Ear, Nose and Throat, St Cloud, Minnesota, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Nov;122(11):665-71. doi: 10.1177/000348941312201101.
This study evaluated in-office balloon dilation of maxillary sinus ostia and ethmoid infundibula to treat chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS).
Seventy-four patients with disease in the maxillary and anterior ethmoid sinuses on computed tomography were prospectively enrolled across 12 study centers. All procedures were performed in the office. The primary outcomes were clinical effectiveness and health-care utilization at 1 year, measured by the validated surveys Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) and Rhinosinusitis Symptom Inventory (RSI).
Dilation was successful in 69 patients (93.2%), and the average periprocedural pain level was 3.2 (scale of 0 to 10). The mean improvement on the SNOT-20 at 1 year was clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the CRS and RARS patient outcomes. The treatment effect was the same in the CRS and RARS subgroups and was either "moderate" or "large" for 10 of 12 symptoms. The mean numbers of antibiotic courses (p < or = 0.001), sinus-related physician visits (p < 0.0001), and number of acute sinus infections (p < 0.001) decreased significantly in both subgroups. There were no serious device-related adverse events, and the rate of revision surgery was 5.8%.
Stand-alone balloon dilation of the maxillary sinus ostia and ethmoid infundibula performed in the office is well tolerated and effectively treats both CRS and RARS.
本研究评估了上颌窦口和筛漏斗的门诊球囊扩张术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)和复发性急性鼻-鼻窦炎(RARS)的效果。
通过计算机断层扫描显示上颌窦和前筛窦有病变的74例患者被前瞻性纳入12个研究中心。所有手术均在门诊进行。主要结局指标为1年时的临床疗效和医疗资源利用情况,通过经过验证的鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-20)和鼻-鼻窦炎症状量表(RSI)进行测量。
69例患者(93.2%)扩张成功,围手术期平均疼痛程度为3.2(0至10分)。1年时SNOT-20的平均改善在临床和统计学上均有显著意义(p<0.0001),CRS和RARS患者的结局无显著差异。CRS和RARS亚组的治疗效果相同,12种症状中有10种的治疗效果为“中度”或“显著”。两个亚组的抗生素疗程平均数(p≤0.001)、鼻窦相关医生就诊次数(p<0.0001)和急性鼻窦感染次数(p<0.001)均显著减少。未发生严重的器械相关不良事件,翻修手术率为5.8%。
门诊单独进行上颌窦口和筛漏斗的球囊扩张术耐受性良好,能有效治疗CRS和RARS。