Suppr超能文献

评估 12 种尿生物标志物在 22 项大鼠敏感性和特异性研究中的相对肾安全性表现。

Evaluation of the relative performance of 12 urinary biomarkers for renal safety across 22 rat sensitivity and specificity studies.

机构信息

Department of Safety Assessment and Laboratory Animal Resources, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 2014 Mar;138(1):3-20. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft330. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

Abstract

Novel urinary kidney safety biomarkers have been identified recently that may outperform or add value to the conventional renal function biomarkers, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (SCr). To assess the relative performance of the growing list of novel biomarkers, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted for 12 urinary biomarkers in 22 rat studies including 12 kidney toxicants and 10 compounds with toxicities observed in organs other than kidney. The kidney toxicity studies included kidney tubular toxicants and glomerular toxicants. The 12 urinary biomarkers evaluated included Kim-1, clusterin, osteopontin, osteoactivin, albumin, lipocalin-2, GST-α, β2-microglobulin, cystatin C, retinol binding protein 4, total protein, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each biomarker and for BUN and SCr to compare the relative performance of the 12 biomarkers in individual animals against the microscopic histomorphologic changes observed in the kidney. Among the kidney toxicity biomarkers analyzed, Kim-1, clusterin, and albumin showed the highest overall performance for detecting drug-induced renal tubular injury in the rat in a sensitive and specific manner, whereas albumin showed the highest performance in detecting drug-induced glomerular injury. Although most of the evaluated kidney biomarkers were more sensitive in detecting kidney toxicity compared with BUN and SCr, all biomarkers demonstrated some lack of specificity, most notably NGAL and osteopontin, illustrating the need for caution when interpreting urinary biomarker increases in rat samples when organ toxicity is unknown.

摘要

最近已经确定了一些新的尿肾安全生物标志物,这些标志物可能比传统的肾功能生物标志物(血尿素氮(BUN)和血清肌酐(SCr))更有效或更有价值。为了评估不断增加的新型生物标志物的相对性能,对包括 12 种肾脏毒物和 10 种除肾脏以外的其他器官毒性化合物在内的 22 项大鼠研究中的 12 种尿液生物标志物进行了综合评估。这些肾脏毒性研究包括肾小管毒性剂和肾小球毒性剂。评估的 12 种尿液生物标志物包括 Kim-1、簇蛋白、骨桥蛋白、骨激活素、白蛋白、脂联素-2、GST-α、β2-微球蛋白、胱抑素 C、视黄醇结合蛋白 4、总蛋白和 N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶。为每个生物标志物以及 BUN 和 SCr 生成了接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线,以比较 12 种生物标志物在个体动物中的相对性能与在肾脏中观察到的微观组织形态变化。在分析的肾脏毒性生物标志物中,Kim-1、簇蛋白和白蛋白以敏感和特异的方式表现出对大鼠药物诱导的肾小管损伤的最高总体性能,而白蛋白在检测药物诱导的肾小球损伤方面表现出最高的性能。虽然与 BUN 和 SCr 相比,大多数评估的肾脏生物标志物在检测肾脏毒性方面更敏感,但所有生物标志物都表现出一定程度的缺乏特异性,尤其是 NGAL 和骨桥蛋白,这表明在解释未知器官毒性的大鼠样本中尿液生物标志物增加时需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验