Suppr超能文献

在未选择的门诊患者人群中,使用两种分析平台测量血清和锂肝素血浆中溶血指数的参考范围。

Reference range of hemolysis index in serum and lithium-heparin plasma measured with two analytical platforms in a population of unselected outpatients.

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Academic Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Feb 15;429:143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hemolysis index (HI) is now available in several laboratory analyzers, but doubts remain about the thresholds for suppressing test results, the degree of standardization among different instrumentations and the use of different reference ranges in different biological matrices. This study was hence planned to establish the reference ranges of HI in serum and lithium-heparin plasma in a population of unselected outpatients, using two analytical platforms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the HI in serum and lithium-heparin samples collected from 135 unselected outpatients, and we also defined the relative reference ranges according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Samples were collected in the morning by expert nurses, using straight needle venipuncture. The HI in serum and lithium-heparin plasma was assessed with Roche Cobas c501 and Siemens Dimension Vista 1500.

RESULTS

The median concentration of cell-free hemoglobin was significantly higher in serum than in lithium-heparin plasma when measured with Cobas c501, but not with Dimension Vista 1500. After categorizing values according to cell-free hemoglobin thresholds, the agreement between instruments was 0.75 (p<0.01) for serum and 0.95 (p<0.01) for lithium-heparin plasma. The upper limits calculated according to CLSI document C28-A3 were 0.22 g/L for Roche Cobas c501 and 0.25 g/L for Siemens Dimension Vista 1500 in serum, whereas they were 0.13 g/L for Cobas c501 and 0.10 g/L for Dimension Vista 1500 in lithium-heparin plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, different thresholds of cell-free hemoglobin should be used between serum and lithium-heparin plasma for monitoring phlebotomy practice.

摘要

背景

目前已有几种实验室分析仪可提供溶血指数(HI),但仍存在一些疑虑,如抑制测试结果的阈值、不同仪器之间的标准化程度以及不同生物基质中使用不同参考范围等。因此,本研究旨在使用两种分析平台,在未选择的门诊患者人群中建立血清和锂肝素血浆中 HI 的参考范围。

材料和方法

我们分析了 135 名未选择的门诊患者采集的血清和锂肝素样本中的 HI,并根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的建议定义了相对参考范围。早上由专家护士使用直针静脉穿刺采集样本。使用罗氏 Cobas c501 和西门子 Dimension Vista 1500 评估血清和锂肝素血浆中的 HI。

结果

使用 Cobas c501 测量时,血清中无细胞血红蛋白的浓度明显高于锂肝素血浆,但使用 Dimension Vista 1500 时则不然。根据无细胞血红蛋白阈值对值进行分类后,两种仪器之间的一致性为血清 0.75(p<0.01),锂肝素血浆 0.95(p<0.01)。根据 CLSI 文件 C28-A3 计算的上限分别为罗氏 Cobas c501 的 0.22 g/L 和西门子 Dimension Vista 1500 的 0.25 g/L ,而 Cobas c501 为 0.13 g/L,Dimension Vista 1500 为 0.10 g/L。

结论

根据我们的数据,在监测采血实践时,血清和锂肝素血浆中应使用不同的无细胞血红蛋白阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验