J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Jan-Feb;54(1):35-41. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13104.
OBJECTIVE To elicit and describe mutually agreed upon common problems and subsequent solutions resulting from a facilitated face-to-face meeting between pharmacists and physicians. DESIGN Descriptive, exploratory, nonexperimental study. SETTING Wisconsin from October to December 2011. PARTICIPANTS Physicians and community pharmacists. INTERVENTION Face-to-face semistructured interviews with pharmacists and physicians from the same community, informed by previous individual interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Methods to enhance collaboration and barriers to implementing collaboration between pharmacists and physicians. RESULTS Physicians and pharmacists generated ideas in which collaboration could improve patient care, including controlled substance monitoring, medication adherence, collaborative practice agreements for point-of-service issues, and a mechanism for urgent communication. Methods on how to collaborate on these issues also were discussed. CONCLUSION Bringing physicians and pharmacists together for a face-to-face interaction that was informed by information gained in previous individual interviews successfully stimulated conversation on ways in which each profession could help the other provide optimal patient care. This interaction appeared to dispel assumptions and build trust. The results of this project may provide pharmacists with the confidence to reach out to their physician colleagues.
通过药剂师和医生之间的面对面会议,引出并描述双方共同认可的常见问题,以及随后提出的解决方案。
描述性、探索性、非实验性研究。
2011 年 10 月至 12 月,威斯康星州。
来自同一社区的药剂师和医生。
基于之前的个人访谈,对药剂师和医生进行面对面的半结构化访谈。
增强合作的方法以及药剂师和医生之间实施合作的障碍。
医生和药剂师提出了一些想法,认为合作可以改善患者的护理,包括对受控物质的监测、药物依从性、针对服务点问题的合作实践协议,以及紧急沟通的机制。还讨论了如何在这些问题上进行合作的方法。
将医生和药剂师聚集在一起进行面对面的互动,这些互动是在前几次个人访谈中获得的信息的基础上进行的,成功地激发了关于每个专业如何帮助对方提供最佳患者护理的对话。这种互动似乎消除了假设,建立了信任。该项目的结果可能会为药剂师提供信心,让他们主动联系他们的医生同事。