Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Nov;122(4):1057-69. doi: 10.1037/a0034878.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes a novel approach to the diagnosis of personality disorders (PDs) in Section III, to stimulate further research with the possibility that this proposal will be included more formally in future DSM iterations. This study provides the 1st test of this proposal in a clinical sample by simultaneously examining its 2 primary components: a system for rating personality impairment and a newly developed dimensional model of pathological personality traits. Participants were community adults currently receiving outpatient mental health treatment who completed a semistructured interview for DSM-IV PDs and were then rated in terms of personality impairment and pathological traits. Data on the pathological traits were also collected through self-reports using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Both sets of trait scores were compared with self-report measures of general personality traits, internalizing symptoms, and externalizing behaviors. Interrater reliabilities for the clinicians' ratings of impairment and the pathological traits were fair. The impairment ratings manifested substantial correlations with symptoms of depression and anxiety, DSM-5 PDs, and DSM-5 pathological traits. The clinician and self-reported personality trait scores demonstrated good convergence with one another, both accounted for substantial variance in DSM-IV PD constructs, and both manifested expected relations with the external criteria. The traits but not the impairment ratings demonstrated incremental validity in the prediction of the DSM-IV PDs. Overall, these results support the general validity of several of the components of this new PD diagnostic system and point to areas that may require further modification.
《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第五版;DSM-5;美国精神病学协会,2013 年)在第三部分中采用了一种新颖的方法来诊断人格障碍(PD),以激发更多的研究,有可能在未来的 DSM 迭代中更正式地纳入这一建议。本研究通过同时检查其两个主要组成部分,首次在临床样本中检验了这一建议,这两个主要组成部分是:人格障碍的评定系统和新开发的病理性人格特质的维度模型。参与者是目前正在接受门诊心理健康治疗的社区成年人,他们完成了DSM-IV PD 的半结构化访谈,然后根据人格障碍和病理性特征进行评定。通过使用DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)进行自我报告,还收集了病理性特征的数据。两组特征评分都与一般人格特征、内化症状和外化行为的自我报告测量进行了比较。临床医生对损伤和病理性特征的评定具有良好的信度。损伤评定与抑郁和焦虑的症状、DSM-5 PD 和 DSM-5 病理性特征具有显著相关性。临床医生和自我报告的人格特征评分彼此之间具有良好的一致性,两者都可以解释 DSM-IV PD 结构的大部分差异,并且都与外部标准有预期的关系。特质,而不是损伤评定,在预测 DSM-IV PD 方面具有增量有效性。总的来说,这些结果支持了这个新的 PD 诊断系统的几个组成部分的一般有效性,并指出了可能需要进一步修改的领域。