• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验DSM-5人格障碍特质模型能否通过精简项目集进行测量:对《DSM-5人格问卷》的项目反应理论研究

Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.

作者信息

Maples Jessica L, Carter Nathan T, Few Lauren R, Crego Cristina, Gore Whitney L, Samuel Douglas B, Williamson Rachel L, Lynam Donald R, Widiger Thomas A, Markon Kristian E, Krueger Robert F, Miller Joshua D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1037/pas0000120. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000120
PMID:25844534
Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes an alternative model of personality disorders (PDs) in Section III, consisting in part of a pathological personality trait model. To date, the 220-item Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012) is the only extant self-report instrument explicitly developed to measure this pathological trait model. The present study used item response theory-based analyses in a large sample (n = 1,417) to investigate whether a reduced set of 100 items could be identified from the PID-5 that could measure the 25 traits and 5 domains. This reduced set of PID-5 items was then tested in a community sample of adults currently receiving psychological treatment (n = 109). Across a wide range of criterion variables including NEO PI-R domains and facets, DSM-5 Section II PD scores, and externalizing and internalizing outcomes, the correlational profiles of the original and reduced versions of the PID-5 were nearly identical (rICC = .995). These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that an abbreviated set of PID-5 items can be used to reliably, validly, and efficiently assess these personality disorder traits. The ability to assess the DSM-5 Section III traits using only 100 items has important implications in that it suggests these traits could still be measured in settings in which assessment-related resources (e.g., time, compensation) are limited.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版,DSM - 5)的第三部分包含了人格障碍(PDs)的替代模型,部分内容由病理性人格特质模型构成。迄今为止,《DSM - 5人格问卷》(PID - 5;Krueger、Derringer、Markon、Watson和Skodol,2012)是唯一专门为测量这种病理性特质模型而明确开发的现存自我报告工具。本研究在一个大样本(n = 1417)中使用基于项目反应理论的分析方法,以探究是否能从PID - 5中识别出一组精简至100个项目的量表,该量表能够测量25种特质和5个领域。随后,这组精简后的PID - 5项目在一个正在接受心理治疗的成年社区样本(n = 109)中进行了测试。在包括NEO PI - R领域和层面、DSM - 5第二部分人格障碍得分以及外化和内化结果等广泛的标准变量中,PID - 5原始版本和精简版本的相关概况几乎相同(rICC = 0.995)。这些结果为以下假设提供了有力支持:一组精简的PID - 5项目可用于可靠、有效且高效地评估这些人格障碍特质。仅使用100个项目就能评估DSM - 5第三部分的特质,这具有重要意义,因为这表明在评估相关资源(如时间、报酬)有限的环境中,这些特质仍然可以被测量。

相似文献

1
Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.检验DSM-5人格障碍特质模型能否通过精简项目集进行测量:对《DSM-5人格问卷》的项目反应理论研究
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1037/pas0000120. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
2
The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍特质替代标准:丹麦人群中三种自我报告形式的比较研究
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):124-35. doi: 10.1037/per0000162. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
3
Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第三部分人格病理学特质模型和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第二部分人格障碍模型的可靠性及其与功能的关联。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):228-236. doi: 10.1037/per0000213. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
5
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Development of a Response Inconsistency Scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表反应不一致性量表的编制
J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):351-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Response Inconsistency Scale.DSM-5 反应不一致性量表的人格问卷的有效性和临床实用性。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):398-405. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality trait model.夸大性和脆弱性自恋与 DSM-5 病理性人格特质模型。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(3):284-90. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.685907. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample.DSM-5 人格量表在 APA DSM-5 现场试验样本中的心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486183. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The link of adverse childhood experiences and attachment to maladaptive personality traits in adults diagnosed with substance use disorder.童年不良经历与被诊断为物质使用障碍的成年人中适应不良人格特质的依恋之间的联系。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 27;13(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03331-6.
2
Emotion Dysregulation in College Students: Contributions of Maladaptive Personality Traits and Momentary Affect.大学生的情绪失调:适应不良人格特质和瞬间情绪的影响
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2025;47(3):65. doi: 10.1007/s10862-025-10243-7. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
3
Unveiling the Layers of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of Clinical Subtypes.
揭示边缘型人格障碍的层次:临床亚型的系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):928. doi: 10.3390/bs15070928.
4
Psychopathological symptoms, personality, and epistemic stances in individuals with myocardial infarction: an empirical investigation.心肌梗死患者的精神病理症状、人格和认知立场:一项实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 22;16:1587747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587747. eCollection 2025.
5
Investigating mood and cognition in people with multiple sclerosis: a prospective cross-sectional study protocol.多发性硬化症患者的情绪与认知调查:一项前瞻性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 30;15(5):e094733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094733.
6
Personality Traits in Adolescents with ADHD: Insights into Dimension Evaluation and Clinical Implications Using the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Questionnaire.注意缺陷多动障碍青少年的人格特质:使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版问卷人格量表对维度评估及临床意义的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3048. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093048.
7
Wherefrom and Whither PD? Recent Developments and Future Possibilities in DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.人格障碍诊断何去何从?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版和《国际疾病分类》第11版中人格障碍诊断的最新进展与未来可能性
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 May;27(5):267-277. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01602-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
8
A Meta-Analysis of the Structural Validity of Original and Brief Versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Iran.伊朗版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表原始版与简版结构效度的Meta分析
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):126-141. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17406.
9
Using the alternative model of personality disorders for DSM-5 traits to identify personality types, and the relationship with disordered eating, depression, anxiety and stress.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格特质的替代人格障碍模型来识别性格类型,以及与饮食失调、抑郁、焦虑和压力的关系。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Feb 7;13(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01204-2.
10
Unraveling the Association: How Identity Mediates the Impact of Childhood Trauma on Criminal Behavior.揭示关联:身份如何介导童年创伤对犯罪行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;15(1):56. doi: 10.3390/bs15010056.