Maples Jessica L, Carter Nathan T, Few Lauren R, Crego Cristina, Gore Whitney L, Samuel Douglas B, Williamson Rachel L, Lynam Donald R, Widiger Thomas A, Markon Kristian E, Krueger Robert F, Miller Joshua D
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1037/pas0000120. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes an alternative model of personality disorders (PDs) in Section III, consisting in part of a pathological personality trait model. To date, the 220-item Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012) is the only extant self-report instrument explicitly developed to measure this pathological trait model. The present study used item response theory-based analyses in a large sample (n = 1,417) to investigate whether a reduced set of 100 items could be identified from the PID-5 that could measure the 25 traits and 5 domains. This reduced set of PID-5 items was then tested in a community sample of adults currently receiving psychological treatment (n = 109). Across a wide range of criterion variables including NEO PI-R domains and facets, DSM-5 Section II PD scores, and externalizing and internalizing outcomes, the correlational profiles of the original and reduced versions of the PID-5 were nearly identical (rICC = .995). These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that an abbreviated set of PID-5 items can be used to reliably, validly, and efficiently assess these personality disorder traits. The ability to assess the DSM-5 Section III traits using only 100 items has important implications in that it suggests these traits could still be measured in settings in which assessment-related resources (e.g., time, compensation) are limited.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版,DSM - 5)的第三部分包含了人格障碍(PDs)的替代模型,部分内容由病理性人格特质模型构成。迄今为止,《DSM - 5人格问卷》(PID - 5;Krueger、Derringer、Markon、Watson和Skodol,2012)是唯一专门为测量这种病理性特质模型而明确开发的现存自我报告工具。本研究在一个大样本(n = 1417)中使用基于项目反应理论的分析方法,以探究是否能从PID - 5中识别出一组精简至100个项目的量表,该量表能够测量25种特质和5个领域。随后,这组精简后的PID - 5项目在一个正在接受心理治疗的成年社区样本(n = 109)中进行了测试。在包括NEO PI - R领域和层面、DSM - 5第二部分人格障碍得分以及外化和内化结果等广泛的标准变量中,PID - 5原始版本和精简版本的相关概况几乎相同(rICC = 0.995)。这些结果为以下假设提供了有力支持:一组精简的PID - 5项目可用于可靠、有效且高效地评估这些人格障碍特质。仅使用100个项目就能评估DSM - 5第三部分的特质,这具有重要意义,因为这表明在评估相关资源(如时间、报酬)有限的环境中,这些特质仍然可以被测量。