Waseda University.
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):813-40. doi: 10.1037/a0035112. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
In the masked priming paradigm, when a word target is primed by a higher frequency neighbor (e.g., blue-BLUR), lexical decision latencies are slower than when the same word is primed by an unrelated word of equivalent frequency (e.g., care-BLUR). This inhibitory neighbor priming effect (e.g., Davis & Lupker, 2006; Segui & Grainger, 1990) is taken as evidence for the lexical competition process that is an important component of localist activation-based models of visual word recognition (Davis, 2003; Grainger & Jacobs, 1996; McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981). The present research looked for evidence of an inhibitory neighbor priming effect using words written in Japanese Kanji, a logographic, nonalphabetic script. In 4 experiments (Experiments 1A, 1B, 3A, and 3B), inhibitory neighbor priming effects were observed for low-frequency targets primed by higher frequency Kanji word neighbors ([symbol in text]). In contrast, there was a significant facilitation effect when targets were primed by Kanji nonword neighbors ([symbols in text]; Experiments 2 and 3). Significant facilitation was also observed when targets were primed by single constituent Kanji characters ([symbols in text]; Experiment 4). Taken together, these results suggest that lexical competition plays a role in the recognition of Kanji words, just as it does for words in alphabetic languages. However, in Kanji, and likely in other logographic languages, the effect of lexical competition appears to be counteracted by facilitory morphological priming due to the repetition of a morphological unit in the prime and target (i.e., in Kanji, each character represents a morpheme).
在掩蔽启动范式中,当目标词被高频邻居(如 blue-BLUR)启动时,词汇判断的潜伏期比被等频率的不相关词(如 care-BLUR)启动时要长。这种抑制性邻居启动效应(如 Davis & Lupker, 2006;Segui & Grainger, 1990)被视为词汇竞争过程的证据,这是视觉词汇识别的局部激活基模型的重要组成部分(Davis, 2003;Grainger & Jacobs, 1996;McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981)。本研究使用日语汉字(一种表意文字,非字母文字)寻找抑制性邻居启动效应的证据。在 4 个实验(实验 1A、1B、3A 和 3B)中,低频目标词被高频汉字词邻居([文字])启动时,观察到了抑制性邻居启动效应。相反,当目标词被汉字非词邻居([文字])启动时,出现了显著的促进效应(实验 2 和 3)。当目标词被单个汉字组成部分([文字])启动时,也观察到了显著的促进效应(实验 4)。这些结果表明,词汇竞争在汉字识别中发挥了作用,就像在字母语言中一样。然而,在汉字中,可能在其他表意文字中,由于在启动和目标中重复一个形态单位(即,在汉字中,每个字符代表一个语素),词汇竞争的效果被促进性的形态学启动所抵消。