• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究创伤闪回的前景和问题:对 Kvavilashvili(2014)的回复。

Prospects and problems in studying traumatic flashbacks: reply to Kvavilashvili (2014).

机构信息

University College London.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):105-8. doi: 10.1037/a0034682.

DOI:10.1037/a0034682
PMID:24364749
Abstract

The study of flashbacks is becoming increasingly important, as new proposals for the 11th edition of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases give them an increasingly prominent role in the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Amplifying the commentary of Kvavilashvili (2014), I contend that further progress is likely to depend on improved definition, distinguishing them from other forms of involuntary memory, and on more precise measurement. Improved measurement requires systematic testing of questionnaire and interview items as well as the use of experimental designs that contrast flashbacks directly with voluntary memory. Future research can now build on a solid base of theory and empirical findings, but it is always likely to be limited by the fact that it is difficult to bring involuntary memory under complete experimental control.

摘要

闪回研究变得越来越重要,因为世界卫生组织第 11 版国际疾病分类的新提案赋予了它们在创伤后应激障碍诊断中的突出作用。我赞同 Kvavilashvili(2014)的观点,进一步的进展可能取决于更好的定义,将其与其他形式的非自愿记忆区分开来,以及更精确的测量。改进的测量需要系统地测试问卷和访谈项目,以及使用实验设计直接对比闪回和自愿记忆。未来的研究现在可以建立在坚实的理论和实证研究基础上,但它总是会受到这样一个事实的限制,即很难将非自愿记忆完全置于实验控制之下。

相似文献

1
Prospects and problems in studying traumatic flashbacks: reply to Kvavilashvili (2014).研究创伤闪回的前景和问题:对 Kvavilashvili(2014)的回复。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):105-8. doi: 10.1037/a0034682.
2
Solving the mystery of intrusive flashbacks in posttraumatic stress disorder: comment on Brewin (2014).解决创伤后应激障碍中侵入性闪回的谜团:评论 Brewin(2014)。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):98-104. doi: 10.1037/a0034677.
3
Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder.情景记忆、知觉记忆及其相互作用:创伤后应激障碍理论基础。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):69-97. doi: 10.1037/a0033722. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
4
Pain flashbacks following the July 7th 2005 London bombings.2005年7月7日伦敦爆炸案后的疼痛闪回。
Pain. 2007 Dec 5;132(3):332-336. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
5
Memory mechanisms in posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的记忆机制。
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002 Summer;14(3):254-61. doi: 10.1176/jnp.14.3.254.
6
Variation in post-traumatic response: the role of trauma type in predicting ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptoms.创伤后反应的差异:创伤类型在预测国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍症状中的作用。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):727-736. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1350-8. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
The role of memory in posttraumatic stress disorder: implications for clinical practice.记忆在创伤后应激障碍中的作用:对临床实践的启示。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2016 July-September;38(3):119-127. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2014-0063. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Posttraumatic flashbacks, dream disturbances, and mental imagery.创伤后闪回、梦境障碍和心理意象。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;46(9):374-8.
9
Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm.使用实验室范式诱导非自愿和自愿的心理时光旅行。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Apr;44(3):376-89. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0564-9.
10
Voluntary and involuntary emotional memory following an analogue traumatic stressor: the differential effects of communality in men and women.模拟创伤性应激源后的自愿和非自愿情绪记忆:男性和女性中共同性的差异影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;45(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.眼动脱敏再处理疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的潜力。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Sep 26;7:273-83. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S52268. eCollection 2014.