• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种真空成型保持器材料的耐磨性:一项实验室研究。

Wear resistance of four types of vacuum-formed retainer materials: a laboratory study.

作者信息

Raja Taiyub A, Littlewood Simon J, Munyombwe Theresa, Bubb Nigel L

机构信息

a  Specialist Orthodontist, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):656-64. doi: 10.2319/061313-448.1. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

DOI:10.2319/061313-448.1
PMID:24364752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8650450/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the resistance to wear of four different vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) materials: Essix C+, Essix ACE, Duran, and Tru-Tain. Essix C+ is a polypropylene polymer; the other materials are polyethylene co-polymers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was undertaken at the Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, UK, with 26 samples in each group. The specimens were vacuum-formed according to the manufacturers' guidelines, and a custom-made wear-simulation machine was used to conduct the test. Each specimen was subjected to 1000 cycles of the wear simulation, with steatite balls as the antagonist material. The resistance to wear of the VFR materials was evaluated by measuring the maximum wear depth using noncontact, three-dimensional surface profilometry. The wear depth was given in micrometers.

RESULTS

The median wear depth was 63.20 µm for the Essix C+ group, 7.88 µm for the Essix ACE group, 9.75 µm for the Duran group, and 12.08 µm for the Tru-Tain group. The Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the four VFR materials detected a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < .001). Comparisons of the groups using the Mann-Whitney U-test demonstrated that the Essix C+ group had significantly greater wear than the other three groups (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in median wear depth between the two groups with the least amount of wear-the Essix ACE and Duran groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the standardized conditions of this laboratory study, the three polyethylene co-polymer materials-Essix ACE, Duran, and Tru-Tain-exhibited significantly less wear than the polypropylene material, Essix C+.

摘要

目的

研究四种不同的真空成型保持器(VFR)材料——Essix C+、Essix ACE、Duran和Tru-Tain的耐磨性。Essix C+是一种聚丙烯聚合物;其他材料是聚乙烯共聚物。

材料与方法

该研究在英国利兹的利兹牙科研究所进行,每组有26个样本。标本按照制造商的指南进行真空成型,并使用定制的磨损模拟机进行测试。每个标本进行1000次磨损模拟循环,以滑石球作为对抗材料。通过使用非接触式三维表面轮廓仪测量最大磨损深度来评估VFR材料的耐磨性。磨损深度以微米为单位给出。

结果

Essix C+组的中位磨损深度为63.20 µm,Essix ACE组为7.88 µm,Duran组为9.75 µm,Tru-Tain组为12.08 µm。用于比较四种VFR材料的Kruskal-Wallis检验检测到各组之间存在统计学上的显著差异(P < .001)。使用Mann-Whitney U检验对各组进行比较表明,Essix C+组的磨损明显大于其他三组(P < .001)。磨损量最少的两组——Essix ACE组和Duran组——的中位磨损深度在统计学上没有显著差异。

结论

在本实验室研究的标准化条件下,三种聚乙烯共聚物材料——Essix ACE、Duran和Tru-Tain——的磨损明显低于聚丙烯材料Essix C+。

相似文献

1
Wear resistance of four types of vacuum-formed retainer materials: a laboratory study.四种真空成型保持器材料的耐磨性:一项实验室研究。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):656-64. doi: 10.2319/061313-448.1. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
2
Wear and fatigue resistance: An in-vitro comparison of three polyethylene terephthalate glycol and thermoplastic polyurethane materials for vacuum-formed retainers.耐磨与耐疲劳性能:三种用于真空成型保持器的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯和热塑性聚氨酯材料的体外比较。
Int Orthod. 2023 Jun;21(2):100748. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100748. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Wear comparison of thermoplastic materials used for orthodontic retainers.用于正畸保持器的热塑性材料的磨损比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):294-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00502-x.
4
The reliability of thermoform retainers: a laboratory-based comparative study.热成型保持器的可靠性:一项基于实验室的对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):503-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju075. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Assessment of wear characteristics, longevity and stiffness of Essix-type retainers.评估 Essix 型保持器的磨损特性、寿命和刚度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 2;28(3):185. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05503-x.
6
Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.真空成型保持器和粘结保持器在牙齿稳定中的应用:一项随机对照试验。第二部分:正畸治疗后 6 个月和 18 个月时患者的感受。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Apr 3;43(2):136-143. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa039.
7
The essential work of fracture of thermoplastic orthodontic retainer materials.热塑性正畸保持器材料断裂的基本工作。
Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):554-61. doi: 10.2319/042809-232.1.
8
Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.粘结式和真空成型保持器的有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Sep;150(3):406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.020.
9
Comparison of the effects of modified and full-coverage thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.改良型与全覆盖式热塑性保持器对咬合接触影响的比较。
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2013;14(1):e198-208. doi: 10.11607/ortho.990.
10
Vacuum-formed retainer versus bonded retainer for dental stabilization in the mandible-a randomized controlled trial. Part I: retentive capacity 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.真空成型保持器与粘结保持器在下颌骨牙齿稳定中的应用:一项随机对照试验。第一部分:正畸治疗后 6 个月和 18 个月的保持力。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Nov 3;42(5):551-558. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz072.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of bleaching agent on the compressive strength of orthodontic thermoplastic retainer materials.漂白剂对正畸热塑性保持器材料抗压强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Jan 24;22:2. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_216_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of simulated gastric acid on the physical and mechanical properties of vacuum-formed retainers: an in vitro study.模拟胃酸对真空成型保持器物理和机械性能的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05548-8.
3
Evaluation of Various Retention Protocols in Sustaining Treatment Outcomes Following Orthodontic Therapy.正畸治疗后维持治疗效果的各种保持方案评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2703-S2705. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_407_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Assessment of wear characteristics, longevity and stiffness of Essix-type retainers.评估 Essix 型保持器的磨损特性、寿命和刚度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 2;28(3):185. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05503-x.
5
Evaluation of the Effect of Nanocoating on Mechanical and Biofilm Formation in Thermoplastic Polyurethane Aligner Sheets.纳米涂层对热塑性聚氨酯正畸矫治器薄片的力学性能和生物膜形成影响的评估
Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):272-276. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_143_23. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
Comparison of mechanical properties and color stability of various vacuum-formed orthodontic retainers: An in vitro study.不同真空成型正畸保持器的力学性能和颜色稳定性比较:一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):953-959. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Forces and moments generated by 3D direct printed clear aligners of varying labial and lingual thicknesses during lingual movement of maxillary central incisor: an in vitro study.不同唇舌侧厚度的 3D 打印透明牙套对上颌中切牙舌向移动时产生的力和力矩:一项体外研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00475-2.
8
Preparation of Nanocomposites for Antibacterial Orthodontic Invisible Appliance Based on Piezoelectric Catalysis.基于压电催化的抗菌正畸隐形矫治器用纳米复合材料的制备。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 5;23(11):5336. doi: 10.3390/s23115336.
9
Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing.用于牙科3D打印的两种选定树脂的压缩模量和拉伸模量的比较。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;15(24):8956. doi: 10.3390/ma15248956.
10
Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials.不同透明正畸保持器材料上生物膜形成的评估。
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Aug 24;11:34. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_7_22. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.纳米填充复合树脂与长石质陶瓷人工牙的耐磨性
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):441-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60262-0.
2
The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.霍利保持器和真空成型保持器的有效性:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.019.
3
Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers.成本效益与患者满意度:霍利保持器和真空成型保持器
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):372-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm039.
4
In vitro wear of various orthotic device materials.各种矫形器械材料的体外磨损情况。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):498-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00545-6.
5
Wear comparison of thermoplastic materials used for orthodontic retainers.用于正畸保持器的热塑性材料的磨损比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):294-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00502-x.
6
Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing.用于体外模拟磨损测试的潜在对照样本材料。
Dent Mater. 2002 May;18(3):246-54. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00043-4.
7
Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers.Essix矫治器与Hawley保持器的比较。
J Clin Orthod. 1998 Feb;32(2):95-7.
8
Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention?关于正畸保持的一种观点?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 May;113(5):507-14. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70261-6.
9
Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention.Essix保持器:用于永久保持的制作与监督
J Clin Orthod. 1993 Jan;27(1):37-45.
10
Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.多重显著性检验:邦费罗尼方法
BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):170. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170.