Health Sciences Program and Department of Kinesiology Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Clin J Sport Med. 2014 Jan;24(1):87-8. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000065.
To compare the intramuscular pressure (IMP) of the tibialis anterior in healthy persons under several exercise conditions with the IMP diagnostic criteria in use for diagnosing chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS).
A search of MEDLINE for the period 1966 to March 2010 used the words "intramuscular," "intracompartment," "anterior compartment," and "anterior tibial compartment" linked with "pressure." Reference lists of relevant studies were searched for further articles.
Articles published in English that tested IMP in the tibialis anterior in asymptomatic humans were included if they used no interventions before or during IMP testing. Studies were excluded if data were given as a percentage of IMP or if the data could not be extracted for the tibialis anterior compartment alone. From 515 articles identified, 38 studies met selection criteria
: Details of the studies included IMP measurement technique, timing of measurement (before, during, and/or after exercise), type and duration of exercise, the number of compartments measured, and participants' ages. Mean or median pressure was recorded in mm Hg.
Criteria for the upper limit of normal pressure under different conditions were the Pedowitz criterion for preexercise IMP (15 mm Hg), the Puranen criterion for IMP during exercise (50 mm Hg), the Styf criterion for relaxation pressure (30-55 mm Hg), and the Pedowitz criteria for mean 1-minute postexercise and 5-minutes postexercise pressures (30 mm Hg and 50 mm Hg, respectively).
Exercise was mostly treadmill walking/running (duration, 1.5-120 min) or ankle dorsiflexion (duration, 10 sec-20 min). Methods of measuring IMP varied from study to study. The lowest mean IMP was identified preexercise at rest (range, 0-20 mm Hg). Five of the 34 studies found a higher mean resting pressure than the criterion (15 mm Hg). Mean pressure during exercise (10 studies, 9 of running, with durations of 5-20 min) varied between 23 mm Hg and 66 mm Hg. Two of these studies found a higher mean peak pressure during exercise than the criterion (50 mm Hg). Mean relaxation IMP, measured in 9 studies, was approximately 25 mm Hg in the 1 treadmill study in which it was measured, whereas studies of dorsiflexion found a range of approximately 5 to 15 mm Hg. All the studies found lower mean relaxation IMP than the criterion (35-50 mm Hg). One of 11 studies and 1 of 10 studies found the mean postexercise IMP after 1 minute and 5 minutes to be above the criteria of 30 mm Hg and 20 mm Hg, respectively.
The limits of anterior tibialis IMP before, during, and after exercise that are used as diagnostic criteria for CECS would include many asymptomatic persons. Intramuscular pressure values were not valid criteria for the presence of the syndrome.
比较几种运动条件下健康人胫骨前肌的肌肉内压(IMP)与用于诊断慢性运动性间隔综合征(CECS)的现行IMP 诊断标准。
1966 年至 2010 年 3 月,使用“肌肉内”、“腔内”、“前室”和“胫骨前室”等词,在 MEDLINE 中搜索与 IMP 相关的文章。进一步的文章是通过查阅相关研究的参考文献获得的。
如果 IMP 测试前或测试过程中未进行任何干预,且在无症状人群中对胫骨前肌进行 IMP 测试的英文发表文章,则将其纳入。如果数据以 IMP 的百分比表示,或者无法单独提取胫骨前室的数据,则排除研究。从确定的 515 篇文章中,有 38 项研究符合选择标准。
纳入研究的 IMP 测量技术、测量时间(运动前、运动中和/或运动后)、运动类型和持续时间、测量的隔室数量以及参与者的年龄等详细信息。以毫米汞柱(mmHg)记录平均或中位数压力。
不同条件下正常压力上限的标准是 Pedowitz 运动前 IMP 标准(15mmHg)、Puranen 运动中 IMP 标准(50mmHg)、Styf 松弛压力标准(30-55mmHg)和 Pedowitz 运动后 1 分钟和 5 分钟平均 IMP 标准(分别为 30mmHg 和 50mmHg)。
运动主要是跑步机行走/跑步(持续时间为 1.5-120 分钟)或踝关节背屈(持续时间为 10 秒-20 分钟)。IMP 测量方法因研究而异。最低平均 IMP 是在休息时(范围 0-20mmHg)静息时确定的。有 5 项研究发现静息时的平均压力高于标准(15mmHg)。9 项跑步运动中的 10 项研究发现,运动期间的平均压力在 23mmHg 至 66mmHg 之间。其中两项研究发现运动期间的平均峰值压力高于标准(50mmHg)。在 9 项研究中测量了松弛 IMP,其中 1 项在跑步机上进行了测量,其平均松弛 IMP 约为 25mmHg,而背屈研究的范围约为 5 至 15mmHg。所有研究均发现松弛 IMP 低于标准(35-50mmHg)。11 项研究中的 1 项和 10 项研究中的 1 项发现,1 分钟和 5 分钟后的运动后 IMP 平均值分别高于 30mmHg 和 20mmHg 的标准。
用于诊断 CECS 的胫骨前肌 IMP 运动前、运动中和运动后的界限将包括许多无症状者。肌肉内压值不是该综合征存在的有效标准。