Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. ; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Nov 11;2(11):2325967114556443. doi: 10.1177/2325967114556443. eCollection 2014 Nov.
To diagnose chronic anterior compartment syndrome (CACS) among patients with exercise-induced leg pain, intramuscular pressure (IMP) is regarded as the gold standard. Two recent studies have suggested that the evidence for commonly used IMP criteria are weak, and the validity has therefore come under question.
To evaluate whether the amplitude of pulse-synchronous IMP oscillations at rest after an exercise test is a reliable parameter that may aid in diagnosing CACS.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 89 consecutive patients with suspected CACS (mean age, 31 years) and 19 healthy subjects (mean age, 28 years) participated in this study. All participants performed an exercise test until they were unable to continue because of leg pain and/or muscle fatigue. The IMP was recorded continuously in the anterior compartment of the leg with a noninfusion pressure recording system, starting 15 to 30 seconds after discontinuation of exercise. To test the amplitude of pulse-synchronous IMP oscillations as an indicator of CACS, a peak-to-peak amplitude of >2 mm Hg was chosen as the cutoff value. The clinical diagnosis of CACS was considered reference standard.
The mean ± SD IMP 1 minute after exercise was 54 ± 16 mm Hg in 53 patients with CACS, 17 ± 6 mm Hg in 36 non-CACS patients, and 18 ± 5 mm Hg in control subjects. The mean amplitude of the oscillations was 7.1 ± 3 mm Hg in patients with CACS, 1.3 ± 0.9 mm Hg in non-CACS patients, and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm Hg in control subjects 1 minute after exercise. The sensitivity of the amplitude to validate CACS was 96%, while the specificity was 94%. The positive predictive value was 96%, and the negative predictive value was 94%.
The amplitude of the pulse-synchronous IMP oscillations at rest after an exercise test that elicits a patient's leg pain and muscle fatigue has high sensitivity to identify an abnormally elevated IMP.
Oscillations are easily recorded during clinical routine IMP measurements. They ascertain the diagnosis of CACS, corroborate the level of IMP, and ensure catheter patency.
在患有运动诱发腿部疼痛的患者中,诊断慢性前间隔综合征(CACS)时,肌肉内压(IMP)被认为是金标准。最近的两项研究表明,常用的 IMP 标准的证据不足,因此其有效性受到质疑。
评估运动试验后休息时脉冲同步 IMP 振荡的幅度是否是辅助诊断 CACS 的可靠参数。
队列研究(诊断);证据水平,2 级。
共有 89 例疑似 CACS 的连续患者(平均年龄,31 岁)和 19 例健康受试者(平均年龄,28 岁)参加了这项研究。所有参与者均进行了运动试验,直到因腿部疼痛和/或肌肉疲劳而无法继续。使用非灌注压力记录系统在腿部前间隔连续记录 IMP,在运动停止后 15 至 30 秒开始。为了测试脉冲同步 IMP 振荡幅度作为 CACS 指标的幅度,选择>2mmHg 的峰峰值幅度作为截断值。将 CACS 的临床诊断视为参考标准。
53 例 CACS 患者运动后 1 分钟的平均±SD IMP 为 54±16mmHg,36 例非 CACS 患者为 17±6mmHg,对照组为 18±5mmHg。CACS 患者的振荡平均幅度为 7.1±3mmHg,非 CACS 患者为 1.3±0.9mmHg,对照组为 1.5±0.6mmHg。运动后 1 分钟时,振幅的灵敏度为 96%,特异性为 94%。阳性预测值为 96%,阴性预测值为 94%。
运动诱发腿部疼痛和肌肉疲劳后休息时脉冲同步 IMP 振荡的幅度对异常升高的 IMP 具有很高的敏感性,可用于识别。
在临床常规 IMP 测量过程中,很容易记录到振荡。它们确定了 CACS 的诊断,证实了 IMP 的水平,并确保了导管的通畅性。