• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACR 适宜性标准:急性髋部疼痛-疑似骨折。

ACR appropriateness criteria acute hip pain-suspected fracture.

机构信息

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.023
PMID:24368044
Abstract

Substantial cost, morbidity, and mortality are associated with acute proximal femoral fracture and may be reduced through an optimized diagnostic imaging workup. Radiography represents the primary diagnostic test of choice for the evaluation of acute hip pain. In middle aged and elderly patients with negative radiographs, the evidence indicates MRI to be the next diagnostic imaging study to exclude a proximal femoral fracture. CT, because of its relative decreased sensitivity, is only indicated in patients with MRI contraindications. Bone densitometry (DXA) should be obtained in patients with fragility fractures. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

摘要

大量的成本、发病率和死亡率与急性股骨近端骨折有关,通过优化的诊断影像学检查可以降低这些风险。放射摄影术是评估急性髋部疼痛的主要诊断测试选择。对于影像学检查结果为阴性的中年和老年患者,证据表明 MRI 是排除股骨近端骨折的下一个诊断影像学研究。由于其相对较低的敏感性,CT 仅在存在 MRI 禁忌症的患者中使用。脆性骨折患者应进行骨密度(DXA)检测。ACR 适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的基于证据的指南,由多学科专家小组每两年审查一次。指南的制定和审查包括对同行评议期刊上的现有医学文献进行广泛分析,并应用成熟的共识方法(改良 Delphi 法)对专家组评估影像学和治疗程序的适宜性进行评分。在缺乏证据或证据不明确的情况下,可以使用专家意见来推荐影像学或治疗方法。

相似文献

1
ACR appropriateness criteria acute hip pain-suspected fracture.ACR 适宜性标准:急性髋部疼痛-疑似骨折。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
2
ACR appropriateness criteria(®) acute trauma to the knee.ACR 适宜性标准(®)膝关节急性创伤。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Feb;9(2):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.10.013.
3
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® limping child--ages 0 to 5 years.ACR 适宜性标准® 跛行儿童 - 0 至 5 岁。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Aug;9(8):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.04.017.
4
ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® acute onset of scrotal pain--without trauma, without antecedent mass.美国放射学会适宜性标准® 急性阴囊疼痛——无创伤,无前驱肿块。
Ultrasound Q. 2012 Mar;28(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182493c97.
5
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Trauma to the Foot.美国放射学会(ACR)足部急性创伤的适宜性标准。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jun;12(6):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
ACR appropriateness criteria blunt chest trauma.美国放射学会(ACR)适宜性标准:钝性胸部创伤
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Apr;11(4):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.019. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) myelopathy.ACR 适宜性标准(®)脊髓病。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 May;9(5):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.01.010.
8
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache.美国放射学会适宜性标准:头痛
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):657-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group.美国放射学会适宜性标准®:育龄期急性盆腔疼痛
Ultrasound Q. 2011 Sep;27(3):205-10. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318229ff88.
10
ACR Appropriateness Criteria non-invasive clinical staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.美国放射学会适宜性标准:支气管源性癌的非侵入性临床分期
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for the classification of hip fractures using the AO-OTA framework.基于 AO-OTA 框架的人工智能模型在髋部骨折分类中的开发和验证。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Jun 18;95:340-347. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40949.
2
Value of CT to detect radiographically occult injuries of the proximal femur in elderly patients after low-energy trauma: determination of non-inferiority margins of CT in comparison with MRI.CT 对低能量创伤后老年患者股骨近端隐匿性骨折的诊断价值:与 MRI 比较的 CT 非劣效性边界的确定。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1113-1126. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06387-2. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
Dedicated MRI in the emergency department to expedite diagnostic management of hip fracture.
急诊科专用磁共振成像以加快髋部骨折的诊断管理。
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):41-44. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01729-5. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Multi-detector CT for suspected hip fragility fractures: A diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.多层螺旋CT用于疑似髋部脆性骨折:一项诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(5):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01696-x. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Fragility fractures of the proximal femur: review and update for radiologists.股骨近端脆性骨折:放射科医生的综述与更新
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):29-45. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3008-3. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly.一种简化MRI方案用于检测老年人影像学隐匿性髋部和骨盆骨折的诊断准确性。
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):103-108. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3004-7. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
CORR Insights: Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.CORR 见解:通过共识向前迈进:一种用于确定骨肿瘤学顶级研究重点的改良德尔菲法
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3056-3059. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5501-8. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Imaging findings of anterior hip dislocations.髋关节前脱位的影像学表现。
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Jun;46(6):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2605-x. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
9
The validity of investigating occult hip fractures using multidetector CT.使用多排螺旋CT研究隐匿性髋部骨折的有效性。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150250. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150250. Epub 2016 Feb 3.