• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者行气管切开术的时机:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Tracheostomy timing in traumatic brain injury: a propensity-matched cohort study.

机构信息

From the Sunnybrook Research Institute (A.S.A., D.C.S., R.A.F., A.K., C.D.M., A.B.N.), Department of Critical Care (D.C.S., R.A.F.), Division of Neurosurgery (T.G.M.), Department of Research Design and Biostatistics (A.K.), and Department of Surgery (A.B.N.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center; Clinical Epidemiology Program (A.S.A., D.C.S., R.A.F., J.G.R., A.K., A.B.N.), Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care (D.C.S., R.A.F.), and Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (J.G.R, A.B.N) and Department of Medicine (J.G.R.), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Division of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):70-6; discussion 76-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a8fd6a.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a8fd6a
PMID:24368359
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is controversial; observational studies have been challenged through confounding by indication, and interventional studies have rarely enrolled patients with isolated TBI.

METHODS

We included a cohort of adults with isolated TBI who underwent tracheostomy within 1 of 135 participating centers in the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program, during 2009 to 2011. Patients were classified as having undergone early tracheostomy (ET, ≤8 days) versus late tracheostomy (>8 days). Outcomes were compared between propensity score-matched groups to reduce confounding by indication. In sensitivity analyses, we used time-dependent proportional hazard regression to address immortal time bias and assessed the association between hospital ET rate and patients' outcome at the hospital level.

RESULTS

From 1,811 patients, a well-balanced propensity-matched cohort of 1,154 patients was defined. After matching, ET was associated with fewer mechanical ventilation days (median, 10 days vs. 16 days; rate ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.75), shorter intensive care unit stay (median, 13 days vs. 19 days; RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.75), shorter hospital length of stay (median, 20 days vs. 27 days; RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.86), and lower odds of pneumonia (41.7% vs. 52.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.80), deep venous thrombosis (8.2% vs. 14.4%; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78), and decubitus ulcer (4.0% vs. 8.9%; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.71) but no significant difference in pulmonary embolism (1.8% vs. 3.3%; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24-1.10). Hospital mortality was similar between both groups (8.4% vs. 6.8%; OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96). Results were consistent using several alternate analytic methods.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, ET was associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay but not hospital mortality. ET may represent a mechanism to reduce in-hospital morbidity for patients with TBI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level II.

摘要

背景

对于严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者,气管切开术的最佳时机存在争议;观察性研究受到指示性混杂的挑战,而干预性研究很少纳入单纯 TBI 患者。

方法

我们纳入了在 2009 年至 2011 年期间,在美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划的 135 个参与中心中的 1 个中心接受气管切开术的成年单纯 TBI 患者队列。患者分为早期气管切开术(ET,≤8 天)和晚期气管切开术(>8 天)。为了减少指示性混杂,通过倾向评分匹配组比较了结局。在敏感性分析中,我们使用时间依赖性比例风险回归来解决不朽时间偏倚,并评估了医院 ET 率与患者在医院水平的结局之间的关联。

结果

在 1811 名患者中,确定了一个平衡良好的 1154 名患者的倾向评分匹配队列。匹配后,ET 与机械通气天数减少相关(中位数,10 天比 16 天;比值比[RR],0.70;95%置信区间[CI],0.66-0.75)、重症监护病房入住时间缩短(中位数,13 天比 19 天;RR,0.70;95%CI,0.66-0.75)、住院时间缩短(中位数,20 天比 27 天;RR,0.80;95%CI,0.74-0.86),肺炎发生率降低(41.7%比 52.7%;比值比[OR],0.64;95%CI,0.51-0.80)、深静脉血栓形成(8.2%比 14.4%;OR,0.53;95%CI,0.37-0.78)和褥疮(4.0%比 8.9%;OR,0.43;95%CI,0.26-0.71),但肺栓塞发生率无显著差异(1.8%比 3.3%;OR,0.52;95%CI,0.24-1.10)。两组间的医院死亡率相似(8.4%比 6.8%;OR,1.25;95%CI,0.80-1.96)。使用几种替代分析方法的结果一致。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,ET 与机械通气、重症监护病房入住时间和住院时间缩短相关,但与医院死亡率无关。ET 可能代表了降低 TBI 患者住院发病率的一种机制。

证据水平

治疗性研究,II 级。

相似文献

1
Tracheostomy timing in traumatic brain injury: a propensity-matched cohort study.创伤性脑损伤患者行气管切开术的时机:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):70-6; discussion 76-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a8fd6a.
2
Timing of tracheostomy placement among children with severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity-matched analysis.严重创伤性脑损伤患儿行气管切开术的时机:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):818-826. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002237.
3
Tracheostomy versus prolonged intubation in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者行气管切开术与长时间插管的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1516-1526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02539-7. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Experience with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is Early Tracheostomy Associated with Better Prognosis?创伤性脑损伤的经验:早期气管切开术与更好的预后相关吗?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.060. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
5
Early versus late tracheostomy in patients with severe traumatic head injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者早期与晚期气管切开术的比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Jun;8(3):343-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.065.
6
Effect of tracheostomy timing in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury.气管切开时机对小儿创伤性脑损伤患者的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;164:111414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111414. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Relationship between intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury patients.重度创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压监测与预后的关系
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Nov;39(6):1043-50. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900610.
8
Tracheostomy practice and timing in traumatic brain-injured patients: a CENTER-TBI study.创伤性脑损伤患者的气管切开术实践和时机:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05935-5. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
Is Early Tracheostomy Better for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury? A Meta-Analysis.早期气管切开术对重度创伤性脑损伤更好吗?一项荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e324-e330. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Trauma Patients With Rib Fractures.创伤性肋骨骨折患者早期与晚期行气管切开术的比较。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Field Attributes May not Accurately Predict the Need for Early Tracheostomy Tube Insertion in Severe TBI Patients: A New Insight With the Help of AI Algorithms.在严重创伤性脑损伤患者中,现场特征可能无法准确预测早期气管切开术的需求:借助人工智能算法的新见解。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;8(3):e70556. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70556. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Association of early versus late tracheostomy with prognosis in hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy patients: A propensity-matched cohort study.缺氧缺血性脑病患者早期与晚期气管切开术与预后的关联:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13268. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13268.
3
Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury.
创伤性脑损伤后气管切开患者的临床管理与护理
Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1455926. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455926. eCollection 2024.
4
Incidence of pressure injury in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者压力性损伤的发生率:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e089243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089243.
5
Effect of Early Versus Delayed Tracheostomy Strategy on Functional Outcome of Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Target Trial Emulation.早期与延迟气管切开策略对严重创伤性脑损伤患者功能结局的影响:一项目标试验模拟。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 9;6(8):e1145. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001145. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
6
A Modern Approach to the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤治疗的现代方法。
Medicines (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;11(5):10. doi: 10.3390/medicines11050010.
7
The impact of delayed tracheostomy on critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study in a chinese tertiary hospital.延迟气管切开术对机械通气危重症患者的影响:中国一家三甲医院的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02411-1.
8
An Audit of Tracheostomy in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤中气管切开术的审计
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1750-1754. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03732-2. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Tracheostomy versus prolonged intubation in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者行气管切开术与长时间插管的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1516-1526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02539-7. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation and Tracheostomy Practice in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者机械通气和气管切开术的撤机实践
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01693-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1.