Khalili Hosseinali, Paydar Shahram, Safari Rasool, Arasteh Peyman, Niakan Amin, Abolhasani Foroughi Amin
Shiraz Trauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.060. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
In this study we compared the effects of early tracheostomy (ET) versus late tracheostomy on traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related outcomes and prognosis.
Data on 152 TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤8, admitted to Rajaee Hospital between March 1, 2014 and August 23, 2015, were collected. Rajaee Hospital is the main referral trauma center in southern Iran and is affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Patients who had tracheostomy before or at the sixth day of their admission were considered as ET, and those who had tracheostomy after the sixth day of admission were considered as late tracheostomy.
Patients with ET had a significantly lower hospital stay (46.4 vs. 38.6 days; P = 0.048) and intensive care unit stay (34.9 vs. 26.7 days; P = 0.003). Mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.99). Although not statistically significant, favorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale >4) were higher and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates were lower among the ET group (P = 0.346 and P = 492, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that ET significantly improves 6-month prognosis (Glasgow Outcome Scale >4) (odds ratio = 2.535; 95% confidence interval: 1.030-6.237). Higher age was inversely associated with favorable prognosis (odds ratio = -0.958; confidence interval: 0.936-0.981). Glasgow Coma Scale and Rotterdam score did not show any effect on 6-month prognosis.
Despite previous concern regarding increased mortality rates among patients who undergo ET, performing a tracheostomy for patients with severe TBI <6 days after their hospital admission, in addition to decreasing hospital and intensive care unit stays, will improve patient prognosis.
在本研究中,我们比较了早期气管切开术(ET)与晚期气管切开术对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)相关结局和预后的影响。
收集了2014年3月1日至2015年8月23日期间入住拉贾伊医院的152例格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8分的TBI患者的数据。拉贾伊医院是伊朗南部主要的创伤转诊中心,隶属于设拉子医科大学。入院前或入院第六天进行气管切开术的患者被视为ET组,入院第六天后进行气管切开术的患者被视为晚期气管切开术组。
ET组患者的住院时间显著缩短(46.4天对38.6天;P = 0.048),重症监护病房停留时间也显著缩短(34.9天对26.7天;P = 0.003)。两组的死亡率无显著差异(P > 0.99)。虽然无统计学意义,但ET组的良好结局(格拉斯哥预后量表>4)比例更高,呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率更低(分别为P = 0.346和P = 0.492)。多因素分析显示,ET显著改善6个月预后(格拉斯哥预后量表>4)(比值比 = 2.535;95%置信区间:1.030 - 6.237)。年龄越大,良好预后的相关性越低(比值比 = -0.958;置信区间:0.936 - 0.981)。格拉斯哥昏迷量表和鹿特丹评分对6个月预后无任何影响。
尽管此前担心接受ET的患者死亡率会增加,但对于重度TBI患者,在入院后<6天进行气管切开术,除了可缩短住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间外,还将改善患者预后。