• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床伦理学与患者权益维护:医疗保健中沟通的力量。

Clinical ethics and patient advocacy: the power of communication in health care.

作者信息

Emrich Inken Annegret, Fröhlich-Güzelsoy Leyla, Bruns Florian, Friedrich Bernd, Frewer Andreas

机构信息

, Glueckstrasse 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany,

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2014 Jun;26(2):111-24. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9225-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-013-9225-1
PMID:24368580
Abstract

In recent years, the rights of patients have assumed a more pivotal role in international discussion. Stricter laws on the protection of patients place greater priority on the perspective and the status of patients. The purpose of this study is to emphasize ethical aspects in communication, the role of patient advocates as contacts for the concerns and suggestions of patients, and how many problems of ethics disappear when communication is highlighted. We reviewed 680 documented cases of consultation in a 10-year period of patient advocates' activity at a big German university hospital with 1,300 beds. On the basis of this extensive material, the article will focus on the intersection of the advocate's work with the problems of patients in hospitals. Deficits in the level of communication between health care professionals and patients were frequently uncovered. Patients primarily complain about the lack of dialogue and empathy. Middle-aged patients consulted the patients' advocate disproportionately more often. Measured against this baseline, the group of 65 and older complained less frequently. Besides complaints the advocate was asked in more than one-third of all cases for information about medical matters, hospital regulations or administrative problems. Patients obviously see the advocate as a well-connected and ideally unbiased contact person for uncertainties concerning their malady or a potential stay in hospital. Those seeking help often set hope in the information given by the voluntary patient representative. It should be highly recommended for every German hospital to establish the position of a patient advocate. Furthermore, patients can profit from regular exchange between the advocate and the Ethics Committee, also, to help ensure that their rights are taken into account and implemented in an ethically desirable context.

摘要

近年来,患者权利在国际讨论中发挥着更为关键的作用。更严格的患者保护法律更加重视患者的视角和地位。本研究的目的是强调沟通中的伦理问题、患者权益倡导者作为患者关切和建议联系人的作用,以及当沟通得到重视时,有多少伦理问题会消失。我们回顾了德国一家拥有1300张床位的大型大学医院在患者权益倡导者10年活动期间记录的680例咨询案例。基于这些丰富的资料,本文将聚焦于倡导者的工作与医院中患者问题的交叉点。医护人员与患者之间的沟通水平经常存在不足。患者主要抱怨缺乏对话和同理心。中年患者向患者权益倡导者咨询的频率格外高。与这个基线相比,65岁及以上的人群抱怨频率较低。除了投诉之外,在超过三分之一的案例中,倡导者还被问及有关医疗事项、医院规定或行政问题的信息。显然,患者将倡导者视为在其疾病或可能住院的不确定性方面人脉广泛且理想情况下公正无偏的联系人。寻求帮助的人往往寄希望于患者志愿代表提供的信息。强烈建议德国的每家医院都设立患者权益倡导者这一职位。此外,患者可以从倡导者与伦理委员会之间的定期交流中受益,这也有助于确保他们的权利在符合伦理要求的背景下得到考虑和落实。

相似文献

1
Clinical ethics and patient advocacy: the power of communication in health care.临床伦理学与患者权益维护:医疗保健中沟通的力量。
HEC Forum. 2014 Jun;26(2):111-24. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9225-1.
2
[Health care ethics committees in German university clinics. A survey of all medical directors and directors of nursing].[德国大学诊所的医疗伦理委员会。对所有医学主任和护理主任的一项调查]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 May 28;129(22):1237-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826851.
3
Integrity in the care of elderly people, as narrated by female physicians.女医生讲述的老年人护理中的诚信问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Jul;10(4):388-403. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne589oa.
4
Education of ethics committees.伦理委员会的培训
Bioethics Forum. 1994 Fall;10(4):12-8.
5
Clinical Bioethics Committees: a Brazilian experience.临床生物伦理委员会:巴西的经验
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):181-92, 207. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0181.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
[Foundation of a Health Care Ethics Committee (HEC) in a nonconfessional hospital. Initial experiences and prospects of the future].[在一家非宗教医院设立医疗伦理委员会(HEC)。初步经验与未来展望]
Med Klin (Munich). 2006 Jul 15;101(7):584-9. doi: 10.1007/s00063-006-1080-2.
8
Patient advocacy and advance care planning in the acute hospital setting.急症医院环境中的患者权益倡导与预立医疗计划
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jun-Aug;24(4):29-36.
9
A national survey of hospital ethics committees.一项关于医院伦理委员会的全国性调查。
Crit Care Med. 1983 Nov;11(11):902-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198311000-00013.
10
The Ethics Committee of the General Faculty Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University.查尔斯大学综合医院及第一医学院伦理委员会。
Sb Lek. 1997;98(3):237-41.

引用本文的文献

1
The Accessibility of Inpatient Pediatric Ethics Consultation Services to Patient Caregivers.住院儿科患者伦理咨询服务对患者照顾者的可及性。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e291-e294. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006662.
2
Clinical ethics consultations in psychiatric compared to non-psychiatric medical settings: characteristics and outcomes.与非精神科医疗环境相比,精神科的临床伦理会诊:特征与结果
Heliyon. 2019 Jan 31;5(1):e01192. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01192. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
Patient advocacy from the clinical nurses' viewpoint: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
What do patients expect from their physicians? Qualitative research on the ethical aspects of patient statements.患者对医生有何期望?关于患者陈述的伦理方面的定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):112-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038026. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
2
Are patients receiving enough information about healthcare rationing? A qualitative study.患者是否获得足够的医疗资源配置信息?一项定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):88-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033241.
3
The principle of justice in patient priorities in the intensive care unit: the role of significant others.
从临床护士视角看患者代言:一项定性研究
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Jun 11;9:5. eCollection 2016.
重症监护病房患者优先级中的公正原则:重要他人的作用。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Aug;35(8):483-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028183.
4
Understanding respect: learning from patients.理解尊重:向患者学习。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul;35(7):419-23. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027235.
5
Patient complaints in Finland 2000-2004: a retrospective register study.2000 - 2004年芬兰患者投诉情况:一项回顾性登记研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):788-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024463.
6
Rounding: how everyday ethics can invigorate a hospital's ethics committee.全面考量:日常伦理如何激发医院伦理委员会的活力。
HEC Forum. 2006 Dec;18(4):319-31. doi: 10.1007/s10730-006-9022-1.
7
[Medical decision making in hospital--results of an exploratory study on the value of shared decision making from the physicians point of view].[医院中的医疗决策——从医生角度对共同决策价值的探索性研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Apr;69(4):206-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973091.
8
Informal complaints on health services: hidden patterns, hidden potentials.关于卫生服务的非正式投诉:隐藏的模式,隐藏的潜力。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Jun;19(3):158-63. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm006. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
9
The patient's work.患者的工作。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Winter;16(1):44-52. doi: 10.1017/s0963180107070053.
10
The federal government commissioner for patient issues in Germany: initial analysis of the user inquiries.德国联邦政府患者问题专员:用户咨询的初步分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 22;7:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-24.