Albright Karen, Saville Alison, Lockhart Steven, Widmer Racich Katina, Beaty Brenda, Kempe Allison
Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo; Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Children's Outcomes Research Program, The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colo; Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Jan-Feb;14(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.09.003.
To assess primary care providers' current reminder/recall practices, preferences for collaboration with health departments in reminder/recall efforts, attitudes toward practice-based and population-based reminder/recall, and experiences with a population-based reminder/recall intervention.
Providers responsible for making decisions about immunization delivery at all primary care practices that participate in the Colorado Immunization Information System were surveyed. Data collection was preceded by an intervention in which half of 14 counties received a population-based reminder/recall intervention conducted by the health department. Practice staff involved in immunization activities were then selected for semistructured telephone interviews that were based on the location of their practice within specified strata, including whether they were in the intervention counties, urban/rural location, and practice type.
A total of 282 (73.6%) of 383 of providers responded to the survey, and 253 who administered vaccines to children 19 to 35 months were retained; 82 staff members at 36 practices were interviewed. Providers' preferences for who should conduct reminder/recall were almost evenly split, with slightly more indicating that it should be conducted by the health department. Cost and feasibility issues were perceived barriers to conducting practice-based recall, particularly among urban practices. Support for population-based reminder/recall was highest among rural practices. Concern about perceived inaccuracies in immunization registry data was the major barrier to conducting population-based reminder/recall. The population-based intervention did not create an undue burden on practices.
A collaborative approach to reminder/recall involving both providers and health departments is preferable for many providers and may be a viable solution to the barriers of practice-based reminder/recall.
评估基层医疗服务提供者当前的提醒/召回做法、在提醒/召回工作中与卫生部门合作的偏好、对基于实践和基于人群的提醒/召回的态度,以及基于人群的提醒/召回干预的经验。
对参与科罗拉多免疫信息系统的所有基层医疗实践中负责做出免疫接种决策的提供者进行了调查。在数据收集之前进行了一项干预,其中14个县中的一半接受了卫生部门进行的基于人群的提醒/召回干预。然后根据其所在实践在特定分层中的位置,包括是否在干预县、城乡位置和实践类型,选择参与免疫活动的实践工作人员进行半结构化电话访谈。
383名提供者中有282名(73.6%)回复了调查,保留了253名给19至35个月儿童接种疫苗的人员;对36个实践中的82名工作人员进行了访谈。提供者对于应由谁进行提醒/召回的偏好几乎持平,略多一些的人表示应由卫生部门进行。成本和可行性问题被认为是进行基于实践的召回的障碍,特别是在城市实践中。农村实践中对基于人群的提醒/召回的支持度最高。对免疫登记数据准确性的担忧是进行基于人群的提醒/召回的主要障碍。基于人群的干预没有给实践带来不必要的负担。
对于许多提供者来说,一种涉及提供者和卫生部门的提醒/召回合作方法更为可取,并且可能是解决基于实践的提醒/召回障碍的可行方案。