Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013 Dec 26;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-7-29.
Psychiatric advance directives, a tool to document preferences for care in advance of decisional incapacity, have been shown to benefit persons with mental illness in a number of countries through improving medication adherence, reducing symptoms from escalating in a crisis, accelerating recovery, and enhancing service user autonomy. While concepts such as autonomy are important in a number of high-income country settings, it remains unclear whether tools like psychiatric advance directives are suitable in a different context. The recent introduction of the psychiatric advance directive into draft legislation in India prompts the question as to how feasible psychiatric advance directives are in the Indian context. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and utility of PADs in India, with a focus on the need for individual control over decision making and barriers to implementation, by exploring views of its central stakeholders, service users and carers.
Qualitative semi-structured interviews (n = 51) with clients (n = 39) and carers (n = 12) seeking mental health treatment at outpatient clinics in urban and rural settings provided by a non-profit organisation in Tamil Nadu, India.
Clients engaged in a number of forms of decision-making (passive, active, and collaborative) depending on the situation and decision at hand, and had high levels of self-efficacy. Most clients and carers were unfamiliar with PADs, and while some clients felt it is important to have a say in treatment wishes, carers expressed concerns about service user capacity to make decisions. After completing PADs, clients reported an increase in self-efficacy and an increased desire to make decisions.
The introduction of psychiatric advance directives in India appears to be associated with positive outcomes for some service users, however, there is a need to better understand how this tool can be adapted to better suit the care context in India and hold meaning and value for service users to complete.
精神科预先指示是一种在决策能力丧失之前记录护理偏好的工具,它已在许多国家证明对精神病患者有益,通过提高药物依从性、减少危机中症状恶化、加速康复和增强服务用户自主权。虽然自主权等概念在许多高收入国家的背景下很重要,但在不同的背景下,像精神科预先指示这样的工具是否合适仍不清楚。最近,精神科预先指示被引入印度立法草案中,这引发了一个问题,即在印度背景下,精神科预先指示的可行性如何。本研究的目的是通过探索其核心利益相关者、服务使用者和照顾者的观点,探讨在印度精神科预先指示的可行性和实用性,重点关注对个人决策控制的需求和实施障碍。
在印度泰米尔纳德邦的一个非营利组织提供的城市和农村环境的门诊诊所中,对寻求心理健康治疗的患者(n=39)和照顾者(n=12)进行了 51 次半结构化定性访谈。
患者根据情况和手头的决策进行了多种形式的决策(被动、主动和协作),自我效能感很高。大多数患者和照顾者都不熟悉精神科预先指示,虽然一些患者认为在治疗意愿方面发表意见很重要,但照顾者对患者做出决策的能力表示担忧。在完成精神科预先指示后,患者报告自我效能感增强,并增加了做出决策的愿望。
在印度引入精神科预先指示似乎与一些服务使用者的积极结果相关,但需要更好地了解如何调整这一工具,以更好地适应印度的护理背景,并使服务使用者完成精神科预先指示具有意义和价值。