• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗吉尼亚州利益相关者对心理健康预先指示的知识、经验和意见调查。

A survey of stakeholder knowledge, experience, and opinions of advance directives for mental health in Virginia.

机构信息

Services Effectiveness Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 905 West Main Street, Box 54, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 May;40(3):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0401-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-011-0401-9
PMID:22240937
Abstract

An innovative Virginia health care law enables competent adults with serious mental illness to plan for treatment during incapacitating crises using an integrated advance directive with no legal distinction between psychiatric or other causes of decisional incapacity. This article reports results of a survey of 460 individuals in five stakeholder groups during the initial period of the law's implementation. All respondents held favorable views of advance directives for mental health care. Identified barriers to completing and using advance directives varied by group. We conclude that relevant stakeholders support implementation of advance directives for mental health, but level of baseline knowledge and perception of barriers vary. A multi-pronged approach will be needed to achieve successful implementation of advance directives for mental health.

摘要

一项创新的弗吉尼亚医疗保健法律使有严重精神疾病的有能力的成年人能够在丧失能力的危机期间使用综合预先指示来规划治疗,而无需在决策能力丧失的精神或其他原因之间进行法律区分。本文报告了在该法律实施的初始阶段对五个利益相关者群体中的 460 个人进行的调查结果。所有受访者都对精神卫生保健的预先指示持有赞成意见。确定完成和使用预先指示的障碍因群体而异。我们的结论是,相关利益相关者支持实施精神卫生保健的预先指示,但基线知识水平和对障碍的看法存在差异。需要采取多管齐下的方法才能成功实施精神卫生保健的预先指示。

相似文献

1
A survey of stakeholder knowledge, experience, and opinions of advance directives for mental health in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州利益相关者对心理健康预先指示的知识、经验和意见调查。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 May;40(3):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0401-9.
2
Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives.临床决策与对精神科预先指示的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):350-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350.
3
A preliminary investigation of opinions and behaviors regarding advance directives for medical care.关于医疗预嘱的意见和行为的初步调查。
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Mar;2(2):161-7.
4
Embedding advance directives in routine care for persons with serious mental illness: implementation challenges.将预先医疗指示纳入严重精神疾病患者的常规护理:实施挑战
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):10-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400276.
5
Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use.医疗照护预先指示——扩大使用的理由
N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241305.
6
Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.加拿大门诊患者与预立医疗指示:知识匮乏、经验欠缺但态度积极。
CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497-502.
7
Advance directives for mental health care: innovation in law, policy, and practice.精神卫生保健预先指示:法律、政策及实践中的创新
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):7-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400435.
8
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示:一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.
9
Interest in psychiatric advance directives among high users of crisis services and hospitalization.危机服务和住院治疗的高使用人群对精神科预先指示的兴趣。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jul;54(7):981-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.981.
10
Service user and clinical perspectives of psychiatric advance directives in New Zealand.新西兰精神科预嘱的服务使用者和临床视角。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Dec;24(6):554-60. doi: 10.1111/inm.12157. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.将精神科预立医疗指示纳入患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索前景与局限
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e68549. doi: 10.2196/68549.
2
Opportunities and challenges of self-binding directives: A comparison of empirical research with stakeholders in three European countries.自我约束指令的机遇与挑战:对三个欧洲国家利益相关者的实证研究比较。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 9;66(1):e48. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2421.
3
Clinician knowledge and attitudes of mental health advance statements in Victoria, Australia.
澳大利亚维多利亚州临床医生对心理健康预先指示的知识和态度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1164-1175. doi: 10.1111/inm.13022. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Stakeholder perspective on barrier to the implementation of Advance Care Planning in a traditionally paternalistic healthcare system.利益相关者对传统家长式医疗体系中实施预立医疗照护计划的障碍的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242085. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychiatric Advance Directives Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities: Why Advance Instructions Should Be Able to Override Current Preferences.《残疾人权利公约》下的精神科预先指示:为何预先指示应能够推翻当前的偏好。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 11;10:631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00631. eCollection 2019.
6
Advance directives in mental health care: evidence, challenges and promise.精神卫生保健中的预先指示:证据、挑战与前景。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):278-80. doi: 10.1002/wps.20268.
7
Unpacking the psychiatric advance directive in low-resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study in Tamil Nadu, India.在资源匮乏环境下解读精神科预先指示:印度泰米尔纳德邦的探索性定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013 Dec 26;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-7-29.