Schwarz Julian, Meier-Diedrich Eva, Scholten Matthé, Stephenson Lucy, Torous John, Wurster Florian, Blease Charlotte
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e68549. doi: 10.2196/68549.
Psychiatric advance directives (PAD), also known as advance statements or advance choice documents, are legal documents that enable people with mental health conditions to specify their treatment preferences in advance for possible future crises. Subtypes of PADs include crisis cards, joint crisis plans, and self-binding directives (also known as Ulysses contracts). These instruments are intended to improve service user involvement and need orientation in the care of mental crises and to avoid traumatization through unwanted treatment. The existing evidence suggests that people who complete a PAD tend to work more cooperatively with their clinician and experience fewer involuntary hospital admissions. Nevertheless, PADs have not been successfully mainstreamed into care due to multiple barriers to the implementation of PADs, mainly around the completion of PADs and their accessibility and use in crises. The reasons for this include the lack of support in the completion process and acceptance problems, especially on the part of professionals. The research to date primarily recommends support for service users from facilitators, such as peer support workers, and training for all stakeholders. In this article, we argue that while these approaches can help to solve completion and acceptance challenges, they are not sufficient to ensure access to PADs in crises. To ensure accessibility, we propose digital PADs, which offer considerable potential for overcoming these aforementioned barriers. Embedded in national health data infrastructures, PADs could be completed and accessed by service users themselves, possibly with the support of facilitators, and retrieved by any clinic in an emergency. We highlight the strengths and limitations of digital PADs and point out that the proposed solutions must be developed collaboratively and take into account digital inequalities to be effective support for people with serious mental health conditions.
精神科预先指示(PAD),也被称为预先声明或预先选择文件,是一种法律文件,它使患有精神健康问题的人能够提前明确其在未来可能出现的危机中的治疗偏好。PAD的子类型包括危机卡、联合危机计划和自我约束指令(也称为尤利西斯契约)。这些工具旨在提高服务使用者在精神危机护理中的参与度和需求导向性,并避免因不必要的治疗而受到创伤。现有证据表明,完成PAD的人往往更愿意与临床医生合作,非自愿住院的情况也较少。然而,由于PAD实施过程中存在多种障碍,主要围绕PAD的完成情况及其在危机中的可获取性和使用,PAD尚未成功成为护理的主流方式。其原因包括在完成过程中缺乏支持以及存在接受问题,尤其是专业人员方面。迄今为止的研究主要建议由同伴支持工作者等促进者为服务使用者提供支持,并对所有利益相关者进行培训。在本文中,我们认为虽然这些方法有助于解决完成和接受方面的挑战,但不足以确保在危机中获取PAD。为确保可获取性,我们提出数字PAD,它在克服上述障碍方面具有巨大潜力。嵌入国家卫生数据基础设施后,服务使用者自己可能在促进者的支持下完成并访问PAD,并在紧急情况下由任何诊所检索。我们强调了数字PAD的优势和局限性,并指出所提出的解决方案必须协同开发,并考虑到数字不平等问题,才能有效地支持患有严重精神健康问题的人。