Russell David F, Deakin Angela H, Fogg Quentin A, Picard Frederic
Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Thomson Building, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK,
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2812-5. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
The ability to quantify rotational laxity of the knee would increase understanding of functional rotatory instability, identify the best treatment methods for soft tissue injury, and have a role in diagnosis of soft tissue injury. This study aimed to report the reliability, repeatability and precision of a non-invasive adaptation of image-free navigation technology by comparing with a validated invasive system used for computer-assisted surgery.
Twelve cadaveric lower limbs were tested with a commercial image-free navigation system using passive trackers secured by bone screws. They were then tested a non-invasive fabric-strap system. Manual application of torque was used consistent with clinical examination to rotate the tibia to the end of internal rotation and external rotation range. Measurements were taken at 10° intervals from full extension to 90° flexion, and protocol was repeated twice using each system. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to reflect reliability of measurements. At each flexion interval, coefficient of repeatability (CR) was calculated for each system, and limits of agreement (LOA) were used to reflect agreement between the systems.
The results for internal and external rotation were combined throughout flexion: ICC invasive; 0.94 (0.86-0.99), non-invasive; 0.92 (0.7-0.99), CR invasive; 2.4° (1.3-4.8°), non-invasive; 3.5° (1.8-6.6), LOA; 8.2° (4.3-13.5).
Non-invasive optical tracker fixation gives improved agreement with a validated method of measurement compared with devices measuring tibial rotation by foot position. This system gives the added possibility of dynamic, weight-bearing testing in the clinically important range of 0°-30° knee flexion without the need for any limb restraint.
量化膝关节旋转松弛度的能力将增进对功能性旋转不稳定的理解,确定软组织损伤的最佳治疗方法,并在软组织损伤的诊断中发挥作用。本研究旨在通过与用于计算机辅助手术的经过验证的侵入性系统进行比较,报告无图像导航技术的非侵入性改编版的可靠性、可重复性和精度。
使用通过骨螺钉固定的被动跟踪器,用商用无图像导航系统对12具尸体下肢进行测试。然后用非侵入性织物带系统对其进行测试。手动施加扭矩,与临床检查一致,将胫骨旋转到内旋和外旋范围的末端。在从完全伸展到90°屈曲的过程中,每隔10°进行测量,每个系统重复该方案两次。组内相关系数(ICC)用于反映测量的可靠性。在每个屈曲间隔,计算每个系统的重复性系数(CR),并使用一致性界限(LOA)来反映系统之间的一致性。
在整个屈曲过程中,将内旋和外旋的结果合并:侵入性ICC为0.94(0.86 - 0.99),非侵入性ICC为0.92(0.7 - 0.99),侵入性CR为2.4°(1.3 - 4.8°),非侵入性CR为3.5°(1.8 - 6.6),LOA为8.2°(4.3 - 13.5)。
与通过足部位置测量胫骨旋转的设备相比,非侵入性光学跟踪器固定与经过验证的测量方法具有更好的一致性。该系统增加了在0° - 30°膝关节屈曲这一临床重要范围内进行动态、负重测试的可能性,而无需对肢体进行任何约束。