Russell David F, Deakin Angela H, Fogg Quentin A, Picard Frederic
Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Thomson Building, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire G81 4DY, United Kingdom.
Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire G81 4DY, United Kingdom.
Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1063-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
Non-invasive quantification of lower limb alignment using navigation technology is now possible throughout knee flexion owing to software developments. We report the precision and accuracy of a non-invasive system measuring mechanical alignment of the lower limb including coronal stress testing of the knee.
Twelve cadaveric limbs were tested with a commercial invasive navigation system against the non-invasive system. Coronal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) alignment was measured with no stress, then 15 Nm varus and valgus applied moments. Measurements were recorded at 10° intervals from extension to 90° flexion. At each flexion interval, coefficient of repeatability (CR) tested precision within each system, and limits of agreement (LOA) tested agreement between the two systems. Limits for CR & LOA were set at 3° based on requirements for surgical planning and evaluation.
Precision was acceptable throughout flexion in all conditions of stress using the invasive system (CR ≤ 1.9°). Precision was acceptable using the non-invasive system from extension to 50° flexion (CR ≤ 2.4°), beyond which precision was unacceptable (> 3.4°). With no coronal stress applied, agreement remained acceptable from extension to 40° (LOA ≤ 2.4°), and when 15 Nm varus or valgus stress was applied agreement was acceptable from extension to 30° (LOA ≤ 2.9°). Higher angles of knee flexion had a negative impact on precision and accuracy.
CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The non-invasive system provides reliable quantitative data in-vitro on coronal MFT alignment and laxity in the range relevant to assessment of collateral ligament injury, pre-operative planning of arthroplasty and flexion instability following arthroplasty. In-vivo validation should be performed.
由于软件的发展,现在可以通过导航技术在整个膝关节屈曲过程中对下肢对线进行无创量化。我们报告了一种测量下肢机械对线的无创系统的精度和准确性,包括膝关节的冠状面应力测试。
使用商用侵入性导航系统与无创系统对12个尸体下肢进行测试。在无应力状态下测量冠状面股骨胫骨(MFT)机械对线,然后施加15 Nm的内翻和外翻力矩。从伸直位到90°屈曲位,以10°间隔记录测量值。在每个屈曲间隔,重复性系数(CR)测试每个系统内的精度,一致性界限(LOA)测试两个系统之间的一致性。根据手术规划和评估的要求,将CR和LOA的界限设定为3°。
在所有应力条件下,使用侵入性系统在整个屈曲过程中的精度均可接受(CR≤1.9°)。使用无创系统从伸直位到50°屈曲时精度可接受(CR≤2.4°),超过该范围精度不可接受(>3.4°)。在未施加冠状面应力时,从伸直位到40°一致性仍可接受(LOA≤2.4°),当施加15 Nm内翻或外翻应力时,从伸直位到30°一致性可接受(LOA≤2.9°)。更高的膝关节屈曲角度对精度和准确性有负面影响。
该无创系统在体外为冠状面MFT对线和与侧副韧带损伤评估、关节置换术前规划以及关节置换术后屈曲不稳定相关范围内的松弛度提供了可靠的定量数据。应进行体内验证。