Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner for abdominal hernias.

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the diagnostic values of an automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for abdominal external hernias.

METHODS

Conventional sonograms and ABVS images from 128 abdominal external hernias in 104 patients (98 male and 6 female; age range, 41-79 years; mean age ± SD, 68.0 ± 14.6 years) were analyzed. The results were identified by surgical outcomes. The hernia type, hernial ring position, hernial sac size, hernia content, and hernia structure were evaluated by both sonographic modalities.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and accuracy differences between the ABVS and conventional sonography for diagnosis of abdominal hernias and hernia size measurements were compared. The hernia types, as confirmed by surgery, included 45 indirect inguinal hernias (30 reducible and 15 irreducible), 12 reducible direct inguinal hernias, 5 femoral hernias, 62 incisional hernias (42 isolated and 20 multiple), and 4 umbilical hernias. The sensitivity of the ABVS was higher than that of conventional sonography for incisional hernias (P < .01), whereas there were no statistical differences in sensitivity for other types of hernias. The ABVS hernial sac number detection rate for both isolated and multiple incisional hernias was significantly higher compared with that of conventional sonography (both P < .01). The ABVS measurements correlated well with surgical results (length, P = .47; width, P = .31).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated breast volume scanner images have the outstanding advantage of displaying the entire scope of the internal structure and the relationship with adjacent tissues of abdominal hernias. Therefore, an ABVS has good application prospects for diagnosis of abdominal external hernias and merits further research.