Riegle-Crumb Catherine, King Barbara, Grodsky Eric, Muller Chandra
The University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Minnesota.
Am Educ Res J. 2012 Dec 1;49(6). doi: 10.3102/0002831211435229.
This article investigates the empirical basis for often-repeated arguments that gender differences in entrance into STEM majors are largely explained by disparities in prior achievement. Analyses use data from three national cohorts of college matriculates across three decades to consider differences across several indicators of high school math and science achievement at the mean and also at the top of the test distribution. Analyses also examine the different comparative advantages men and women enjoy in math/science vs. English/reading. Regardless of how prior achievement is measured, very little of the strong and persistent gender gap in physical science and engineering majors over time is explained. Findings highlight the limitations of theories focusing on gender differences in skills and suggest directions for future research.
本文探讨了一些经常被提及的观点的实证依据,这些观点认为进入STEM专业的性别差异很大程度上是由先前成绩的差异所解释的。分析使用了来自三个十年间全国大学新生队列的数据,以考察高中数学和科学成绩在均值以及考试分布顶端的几个指标上的差异。分析还考察了男性和女性在数学/科学与英语/阅读方面所享有的不同比较优势。无论先前成绩如何衡量,随着时间推移,物理科学和工程专业中强烈且持续存在的性别差距几乎无法得到解释。研究结果凸显了关注技能性别差异的理论的局限性,并为未来研究指明了方向。