Suppr超能文献

异基因造血干细胞移植后基于微小残留病的抢先供者淋巴细胞输注在急性白血病患者中的优势。

Superiority of preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion based on minimal residual disease in acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

机构信息

Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2014 Jun;54(6):1493-500. doi: 10.1111/trf.12524. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was used as salvage therapy in leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but existing results on DLI administration to acute leukemia patients were disappointing. Although increasing minimal residual disease (MRD) after HSCT had been proven to be highly indicative of posttransplant relapse, preemptive DLI (pDLI) based on MRD has not been well evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 70 acute leukemia patients after allo-HSCT in our center between January 2005 and December 2010. Sixteen patients received pDLIs based on increasing MRD results (pDLI group), and 11 relapsed patients received therapeutic DLIs with or without chemotherapy (tDLI group). Donor lymphocytes were collected from the original donors without stimulation and infused without further manipulation. The median mononuclear cell doses and CD3+ cell doses were 1.49 × 10(8) and 5.51 × 10(7) /kg. Forty-three patients who did not receive pDLI therapy after detecting increasing MRD (no pDLI group) were also included as a comparison.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% in the pDLI group, whereas it was 63.6% in the tDLI group (p=0.019). Survival outcomes were superior in the pDLI group compared with the tDLI group (χ(2) = 14.624, p=0.000); estimated overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 93.8% with pDLI and 27.3% with tDLI. The incidence of overall acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and Grade III to IV aGVHD was higher in the pDLI group but with no significance. Patients in the "no pDLI" group showed an inferior prognosis with 1-year OS at 65.1% (95% confidence interval, 50.8%-79.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pDLI and suggested that pDLI based on MRD monitoring was superior in acute leukemia patients with potential progression compared with salvage DLI administrated in overt relapse.

摘要

背景

供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)已被用作异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后白血病复发的挽救治疗,但现有 DLI 治疗急性白血病患者的结果并不令人满意。虽然 HSCT 后最小残留病(MRD)的增加已被证明与移植后复发高度相关,但基于 MRD 的预防性 DLI(pDLI)尚未得到很好的评估。

研究设计和方法

我们回顾性分析了 2005 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月在我中心接受 allo-HSCT 的 70 例急性白血病患者。16 例患者根据 MRD 结果增加接受了 pDLI(pDLI 组),11 例复发患者接受了有或没有化疗的治疗性 DLI(tDLI 组)。供者淋巴细胞未经刺激采集并输注,无需进一步处理。中位单核细胞剂量和 CD3+细胞剂量分别为 1.49×10(8)和 5.51×10(7) /kg。43 例在检测到 MRD 增加后未接受 pDLI 治疗的患者(无 pDLI 组)也作为对照纳入。

结果

pDLI 组的反应率为 100%,而 tDLI 组为 63.6%(p=0.019)。pDLI 组的生存结果优于 tDLI 组(χ(2) = 14.624,p=0.000);pDLI 组的估计总生存率(OS)为 93.8%,tDLI 组为 27.3%。pDLI 组的总急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)和 III 至 IV 级 aGVHD 的发生率较高,但无统计学意义。“无 pDLI”组患者的预后较差,1 年 OS 为 65.1%(95%置信区间,50.8%-79.4%)。

结论

我们的结果表明 pDLI 的疗效和安全性,并表明与明显复发时给予的挽救性 DLI 相比,基于 MRD 监测的 pDLI 在有进展潜能的急性白血病患者中更为有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验