• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在难治/复发性急性白血病患者中,进行异基因造血干细胞移植后,采用预防供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI),随后进行微小残留病和移植物抗宿主病指导的多次 DLI,可改善预后。

Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Followed by Minimal Residual Disease and Graft-versus-Host Disease-Guided Multiple DLIs Could Improve Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia.

机构信息

Peking University Peoples Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Beijing, China.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;23(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.028
PMID:28483716
Abstract

Patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are still at a high risk for relapse post-transplant. To investigate the impact of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) followed by minimal residual disease (MRD) test and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-guided multiple DLIs to prevent relapse and improve survival in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who received allo-HSCT. A multicenter prospective study was designed. In total, 100 patients who achieved complete remission at 30 days post-transplant and had no uncontrolled infection, organ failure, or active GVHD were eligible First, prophylactic DLI was administered at 30 days after HLA-matched related HSCT or 45 to 60 days after HLA-matched unrelated HSCT or haploidentical HSCT. Subsequently, multiple DLIs were administered based on the results of MRD test and whether they developed GVHD. In addition to DLI, chemotherapy was also given to patients who had a positive MRD test. Three-year cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and survival post-transplant were 32.4% (95% confidence interval, 22.4% to 42.4%), 50.3% (95% confidence interval, 40.3% to 60.3%), and 51.4% (95% confidence interval, 41.2% to 61.6%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, a positive MRD test (HR, 3.840; 95% confidence interval, 1.678 to 5.784; P= .001) and receiving 1 course of DLI (HR, 4.346; 95% confidence interval, 1.223 to 9.450, P= .023) were associated with an increased relapse risks. These data suggest that prophylactic DLI followed by MRD test and GVHD-guided multiple DLIs reduced relapse and increased survival post-transplant in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who received allo-HSCT. The study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01455272.

摘要

接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的难治/复发急性白血病患者在移植后仍有很高的复发风险。为了研究预防性供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)继以微小残留病(MRD)检测和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)指导的多次 DLI 预防复发和改善难治/复发急性白血病患者allo-HSCT 后的生存情况,进行了一项多中心前瞻性研究。共纳入 100 例移植后 30 天达完全缓解且无未控制感染、器官衰竭或活动性 GVHD 的患者。首先,在 HLA 匹配的相关 HSCT 后 30 天或 HLA 匹配的无关 HSCT 或单倍体 HSCT 后 45-60 天给予预防性 DLI。随后,根据 MRD 检测结果和是否发生 GVHD 给予多次 DLI。除 DLI 外,MRD 检测阳性的患者还给予化疗。3 年累积复发率、无白血病生存率和移植后生存率分别为 32.4%(95%可信区间,22.4%至 42.4%)、50.3%(95%可信区间,40.3%至 60.3%)和 51.4%(95%可信区间,41.2%至 61.6%)。多变量分析显示,MRD 检测阳性(HR,3.840;95%可信区间,1.678 至 5.784;P=0.001)和接受 1 疗程 DLI(HR,4.346;95%可信区间,1.223 至 9.450,P=0.023)与复发风险增加相关。这些数据表明,难治/复发急性白血病患者接受 allo-HSCT 后,预防性 DLI 继以 MRD 检测和 GVHD 指导的多次 DLI 可降低复发率,提高移植后生存率。该研究在 www.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01455272。

相似文献

1
Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Followed by Minimal Residual Disease and Graft-versus-Host Disease-Guided Multiple DLIs Could Improve Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia.在难治/复发性急性白血病患者中,进行异基因造血干细胞移植后,采用预防供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI),随后进行微小残留病和移植物抗宿主病指导的多次 DLI,可改善预后。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;23(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 May 5.
2
Minimal residual disease- and graft-vs.-host disease-guided multiple consolidation chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion prevent second acute leukemia relapse after allotransplant.微小残留病和移植物抗宿主病指导下的多次巩固化疗及供者淋巴细胞输注可预防异基因移植后第二次急性白血病复发。
J Hematol Oncol. 2016 Sep 15;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0319-5.
3
Preemptive low-dose interleukin-2 or DLI for late-onset minimal residual disease in acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植后急性白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征中晚期微小残留病的预防性低剂量白细胞介素-2 或 DLI。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb;100(2):517-527. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04326-6. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
4
Optimized therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: long-term clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life assessment.优化难治或复发急性髓系白血病患者的治疗策略:长期临床结局和健康相关生活质量评估。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022 Dec;42(12):1387-1402. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12376. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
5
Chemotherapy followed by modified donor lymphocyte infusion as a treatment for relapsed acute leukemia after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion: superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone and an analysis of prognostic factors.在未经体外 T 细胞清除的情况下,采用半相合造血干细胞移植后改良供者淋巴细胞输注治疗复发急性白血病的化疗:与单独化疗相比具有更好的结果,并分析了预后因素。
Eur J Haematol. 2013 Oct;91(4):304-14. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12168. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
6
Comparison of outcomes after donor lymphocyte infusion with or without prior chemotherapy for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植后,针对急性白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征微小残留病,进行供体淋巴细胞输注并联合或不联合化疗的疗效比较。
Ann Hematol. 2017 May;96(5):829-838. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-2960-7. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
Salvage chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed donor leukocyte infusion with graft-vs.-host disease control for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prognostic factors and clinical outcomes.异基因造血干细胞移植后,采用挽救性化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子预处理的供者白细胞输注并控制移植物抗宿主病,用于治疗急性白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征的微小残留病:预后因素及临床结局
Eur J Haematol. 2016 Mar;96(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12591. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
8
Prognostic factors on graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adults with acute leukemia.成人急性白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后无移植物抗宿主病和无复发生存的预后因素
Leuk Res. 2017 Aug;59:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after haploidentical versus matched-sibling PBSCT in very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.在极高危急性髓系白血病患者中,比较亲缘单倍体与同胞相合供者 PBSCT 后预防性供者淋巴细胞输注的安全性和有效性。
Ann Hematol. 2019 May;98(5):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03636-8. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
10
Immunosuppression for 6-8 weeks after modified donor lymphocyte infusion reduced acute graft-versus-host disease without influencing graft-versus-leukemia effect in haploidentical transplant.在单倍体移植中,改良供体淋巴细胞输注后进行6至8周的免疫抑制可降低急性移植物抗宿主病,且不影响移植物抗白血病效应。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(20):3602-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune Reconstitution after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Different Non-T-Cell Depletion Protocols.采用不同非T细胞去除方案的单倍体造血干细胞移植后的免疫重建
MedComm (2020). 2025 May 19;6(6):e70206. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70206. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
[Progress in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia].[急性髓系白血病造血干细胞移植的进展]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 14;46(2):179-185. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240422-00157.
3
Modified Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) in an Adult T Cell Lymphoma/Leukemia (ATLL) Patient-Modality of Relapse Prevention.
成人T细胞淋巴瘤/白血病(ATLL)患者中改良预防性供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)——复发预防方式
Diseases. 2024 Sep 11;12(9):210. doi: 10.3390/diseases12090210.
4
Exploring Pattern of Relapse in Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Stem Cell Transplant Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法探索接受干细胞移植的急性淋巴细胞白血病和急性髓细胞白血病儿科患者的复发模式。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 10;13(14):4021. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144021.
5
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.异体造血干细胞移植治疗难治性急性髓系白血病。
Cells. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):755. doi: 10.3390/cells13090755.
6
The graft-versus-leukemia effect of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is equally effective in relapse prevention but safer compared to spontaneous graft-versus-host disease.异基因干细胞移植后预防性供者淋巴细胞输注的移植物抗白血病效应在预防复发方面同样有效,但与自发性移植物抗宿主病相比更安全。
Ann Hematol. 2023 Sep;102(9):2529-2542. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05276-5. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Analysis benefits of a second Allo-HSCT after CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after transplant.分析在移植后复发的复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中,在接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗后进行第二次同种异体 HSCT 的获益。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1191382. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191382. eCollection 2023.
8
Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.急性淋巴细胞白血病异基因造血细胞移植后预防和克服复发的新策略。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1191912. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191912. eCollection 2023.
9
How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.如何通过异基因造血干细胞移植改善老年急性髓系白血病患者的结局。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 3;14:1102966. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1102966. eCollection 2023.
10
Safety and efficacy of post-haematopoietic cell transplantation maintenance therapy with blinatumomab for relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: protocol for a phase I-II, multicentre, non-blinded, non-controlled trial (JPLSG SCT-ALL-BLIN21).Blinatumomab 用于治疗复发/难治性 CD19 阳性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病的造血干细胞移植后维持治疗的安全性和有效性:一项 I/II 期、多中心、非盲、非对照试验(JPLSG SCT-ALL-BLIN21)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e070051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070051.