Mo Xiao-Dong, Zhang Xiao-Hui, Xu Lan-Ping, Wang Yu, Yan Chen-Hua, Chen Huan, Chen Yu-Hong, Han Wei, Wang Feng-Rong, Wang Jing-Zhi, Liu Kai-Yan, Huang Xiao-Jun
Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.
Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ann Hematol. 2017 May;96(5):829-838. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-2960-7. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
The efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) without chemotherapy was investigated and compared with that of chemotherapy prior to DLI (Chemo-DLI) in patients who were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We enrolled 115 consecutive patients who received either DLI (n = 20) or Chemo-DLI (n = 95) during the same period. For each DLI recipient, three recipients matched for age at the HSCT, underlying diseases, and the year of the HSCT were randomly selected from the Chemo-DLI cohort (n = 60). The 2-year cumulative incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable between the groups. Fifteen (75.0%) and 47 (78.3%) patients in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups turned MRD-negative, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality after intervention were 30.7 versus 39.6% (P = 0.582) and 10.3 versus 6.0% (P = 0.508) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. The 2-year probabilities of disease-free, overall, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival after preemptive intervention were 58.9 versus 54.3% (P = 0.862), 69.3 versus 78.1% (P = 0.361), and 44.4 versus 35.1% (P = 0.489) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the intervention method did not significantly influence the clinical outcomes. In summary, preemptive DLI alone may be effective for patients who are MRD-positive and may be a potential alternative for patients who refuse or are unable to receive Chemo-DLI after HSCT.
在异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后微小残留病(MRD)呈阳性的患者中,研究了不进行化疗的供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的疗效,并将其与DLI前进行化疗(化疗-DLI)的疗效进行比较。我们纳入了115例在同一时期接受DLI(n = 20)或化疗-DLI(n = 95)的连续患者。对于每个DLI接受者,从化疗-DLI队列(n = 60)中随机选择三名在HSCT时年龄、基础疾病和HSCT年份相匹配的接受者。两组之间严重急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)和慢性GVHD的2年累积发病率相当。DLI组和化疗-DLI组分别有15例(75.0%)和47例(78.3%)患者MRD转为阴性。干预后复发和非复发死亡率的2年累积发病率在DLI组和化疗-DLI组中分别为30.7%对39.6%(P = 0.582)和10.3%对6.0%(P = 0.508)。抢先干预后无病生存、总生存和无GVHD/无复发生存的2年概率在DLI组和化疗-DLI组中分别为58.9%对54.3%(P = 0.862)、69.3%对78.1%(P = 0.361)和44.4%对35.1%(P = 0.489)。在多变量分析中,干预方法对临床结果没有显著影响。总之,单独的抢先DLI可能对MRD阳性患者有效,并且可能是HSCT后拒绝或无法接受化疗-DLI的患者的潜在替代方案。